Impending votes

2009-06-07 Thread David Jencks
I've been playing around with genesis to get it releasable and the jaspi spec jar. Jetty needs the latter for their incipient IP review so we need to get it out quickly. It looks like the site plugin is totally broken http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-395 so I'll beat my head again

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-289) Unable to deploy EJB application on AG 2.1 through Eclipse

2009-06-07 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12717163#action_12717163 ] viola.lu commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-289: --- i ran it on G2.2 and GEP 2

[jira] Deleted: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-576) Can't find setManagedForm error when build GEP 2.2.0 trunk

2009-06-07 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu deleted GERONIMODEVTOOLS-576: -- > Can't find setManagedForm error when build GEP 2.2.0 trunk > --

Re: 2.2 docs index confusion?

2009-06-07 Thread Ying Tang
Thanks, Donald. We notice that only URLs such as http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22/Documentation are updated minutes after editing. URLs like http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/ are often out of date. Best Regards, Ying Tang 2009/6/5, Donald Woods : > I just triggered an export

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575) GEP errors that are logged to the Eclipse error log are not always seen by end-user

2009-06-07 Thread Delos Dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12717115#action_12717115 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575: Now, as my understanding

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4678) Initial Japanese translation

2009-06-07 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
Initial Japanese translation Key: GERONIMO-4678 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4678 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: public (Regular issues) Component

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 782293

2009-06-07 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 782293 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090607/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090607/unit-test

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4654) Release genesis 2, use it

2009-06-07 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-4654: -- Assignee: David Jencks > Release genesis 2, use it > - > >

Re: nabble needs attention

2009-06-07 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it was me... --jason On Jun 7, 2009, at 10:47 PM, David Jencks wrote: Apparently we're supposed to upgrade our nabble stuff... http://www.nabble.com/help/Answer.jtp?id=42&skin=134 which you get to by clicking the "are you the owner of this project" warning link from e.g. http://

Tomcat patch procedure kinda broken

2009-06-07 Thread David Jencks
I was trying to figure out how to get debuggable source for our patched tomcat and discovered that the currently checked in patch is mostly a diff from the previous patch, thus kinda unusable. I've previously complained that with our private repo system we are releasing code without providi

nabble needs attention

2009-06-07 Thread David Jencks
Apparently we're supposed to upgrade our nabble stuff... http://www.nabble.com/help/Answer.jtp?id=42&skin=134 which you get to by clicking the "are you the owner of this project" warning link from e.g. http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-f134.html So who _is_ the "owner" of this stuff? I haven