On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox,
I found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each
Configuration ( or a bundle) will search it and start the
configuration as we do in the past while starting.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:25, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox, I found
that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each Configuration (
or a bundle) will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758606#action_12758606
]
Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-595:
This is caused by the
Geronimo Revision: 817966 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090923/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090923/unit-test-reports
2009/9/23 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox, I
found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each
Configuration ( or a bundle) will search it and start the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758616#action_12758616
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4658:
If the time is not tight, I wish that we could include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758620#action_12758620
]
Victor Fang commented on GERONIMO-4658:
---
I already created a new menu item named
Geronimo Revision: 817982 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/unit-test
Null destination error when browsing a new created jmx resource group.
--
Key: GERONIMO-4891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4891
Project: Geronimo
2009/9/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
2009/9/23 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox, I
found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each
Configuration ( or a bundle)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lu Jiang updated GERONIMO-4891:
---
Summary: Null destination error when browsing a new created jms resource
group. (was: Null
What I mean is that, currently, Geronimo kernel is running in the OSGI
environment, and all those GBeans are running in the kernel. I would like
to see that the OSGI is Geronimo kernel. As you said in the comments below,
we might not need a kernel at all :-)
Yes. I hope so.
I'm
2009/9/23 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
2009/9/23 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
2009/9/23 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox, I
found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service,
Environment is linux. Where would this replacement happen. I can
have a look at it.
Quintin Beukes
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:26 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I fixed this problem once recently, and no longer see it on my mac. Are you
sure the source is up to date with svn?
Re. being up to date:
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.2
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 816550
Then, I did the full build of all artifacts, ie. from the root typed:
mvn install
Farm Deployment Error if deploy more than one applications
--
Key: GERONIMO-4892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4892
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
cann't create a jmx server to monitor a remote server which is in Ubuntu
---
Key: GERONIMO-4893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4893
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758636#action_12758636
]
Bin He commented on GERONIMO-4893:
--
But the server in Ubuntu can monitor the server in
2009/9/23 Quintin Beukes quin...@skywalk.co.za
What I mean is that, currently, Geronimo kernel is running in the
OSGI
environment, and all those GBeans are running in the kernel. I would
like
to see that the OSGI is Geronimo kernel. As you said in the comments
below,
we might
Virtual Host doesn't work
--
Key: GERONIMO-4894
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4894
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Tomcat
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox,
I found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each
Configuration ( or a bundle) will search it and start the
configuration as we do in the
Geronimo Revision: 818067 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/unit-test-reports
What's the story on Jetty? The 2.2 branch is using Jetty 7.0.1-SNAPSHOT
right now
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I think things are moving along for 2.2.
- our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed
its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758691#action_12758691
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4493:
I will remove this function, currently by default,
The Aries podling has just been accepted (see
http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place
for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo.
This vote is mainly for donating the code to the Aries project and
maintain it there.
[ ] +1 Donate the
+1
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 15:14, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
The Aries podling has just been accepted (see
http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place
for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo.
This vote is mainly for donating
Geronimo Revision: 818087 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan resolved GERONIMO-4891.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.2
Use the destination name as the
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think things are moving along for 2.2.
- our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have
passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look.
- ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates. The first one showed no
Guillaume,
This topic was slightly touched on during the Blueprint release vote.
However, I encourage you to start by discussing with the community,
first. Rather than simply calling a VOTE.
--kevan
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The Aries podling has just been
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the RI of this spec).
The code was developed at Geronimo mostly because the people that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758761#action_12758761
]
Siqi Du commented on GERONIMO-4893:
---
Hi, Bin. Have you tested this case on other
On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the RI of this spec).
The code was
On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Ivan wrote:
After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the
sanbox, I found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI
service, and each Configuration ( or a bundle) will
Geronimo Revision: 818178 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/unit-test-reports
I agree that we should move it to Aries.
Joe
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the RI of this
If the update/review of the LICENSE/NOTICE information is a lot of
work, send some my way if it will help release some of the developer's
time for more important tasks.
Quintin Beukes
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758838#action_12758838
]
Radim Kolar commented on GERONIMO-4296:
---
I see this as quite serious security
RunHua Chi wrote:
We'd like to hear more about your comments to the document such as the
documents are not well-orgnized? what kind of topics are missing? Or you
can
share your experience briefly, we can help to document? I think more
details
will do more help.
I have not checked WAS
Geronimo Revision: 818206 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/unit-test
Makes sense to me too.
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the RI of this spec).
The code was
So it sounds like I can't put off learning OSGi anymore :)
Does anyone have suggested resources (books, websites, or tutorials)
that they found useful?
Thanks in advance,
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
Over the weekend I got my sandbox osgi framework to build and generate
all the plugins as osgi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4513:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2)
Wish List
great feature, need a patch or
Geronimo Revision: 818320 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090923/unit-test-reports
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758954#action_12758954
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4836:
I applied a slightly modified patch to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758957#action_12758957
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4836:
Oops, you are ahead of me with porting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758970#action_12758970
]
Bin He commented on GERONIMO-4893:
--
Hi Siqi,
I test this in SUSE and there is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
viola.lu closed GERONIMO-4894.
--
Resolution: Invalid
It's cozed by Firefox Cache, works find on IE.So close it.
Virtual Host
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bin He updated GERONIMO-4876:
-
Description:
start server
shutdown server using shutdown.bat
It shows an error:
2009-09-15
Geronimo Revision: 818335 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090923/unit-test
Application items are not removed from config.xml on farm members after farm
undeploy applications from master node
---
Key: GERONIMO-4895
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4895:
---
Attachment: FarmConfig.zip
Application items are not removed from config.xml on farm members
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4892:
---
Description:
Win2003 as master node( NODE2) with config.xml
...
module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4892:
---
Attachment: TwoFarm.zip
Farm Deployment Error if deploy more than one applications
Hi all, FYI.
Topics about GEP v2.2 new feature/improvements are ready.
1. Manage user Account in GEP
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/configuring-your-development-environment.html#Configuringyourdevelopmentenvironment-Editingaserverconfiguration
2. Datasource pool wizard in GEP
55 matches
Mail list logo
