[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 818373

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818373 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090924/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20090924/unit-test-reports

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4825) can not config geronimo as a service in ubuntu

2009-09-24 Thread liangkun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12759041#action_12759041 ] liangkun commented on GERONIMO-4825: Thanks viola's path and I have verified the

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4825) can not config geronimo as a service in ubuntu

2009-09-24 Thread liangkun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liangkun closed GERONIMO-4825. -- can not config geronimo as a service in ubuntu --

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 818382

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818382 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/unit-test

Re: documentation is important too

2009-09-24 Thread chi runhua
Hi Radim, thanks for your comments. Details of elements in each deployment plan, you may refer to [1]. And I hope this is what you are looking for. About samples, Geronimo has a complex sample application named daytrader, but its latest version for G2.2 is still under working. You may svn co the

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Rick McGuire
Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of Spring-DM being the RI of this spec). The code was developed at Geronimo mostly

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Right, and I'll make sure it's the case. Karaf includes Blueprint and might not want to include everything from Aries. On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:41, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote: Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4822) Monitoring server via JMX cannot be restarted.

2009-09-24 Thread Siqi Du (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4822: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-4822.patch This patch will help you to need not to wait for a long time.

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4889) sysdb-portlets BUILD ERROR

2009-09-24 Thread Akira Higuchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12759101#action_12759101 ] Akira Higuchi commented on GERONIMO-4889: - REX, On my env,I can build

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 818453

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818453 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090924/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090924/unit-test-reports

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4890) The graphs still can be seen under the view when I disable the server

2009-09-24 Thread Siqi Du (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4890: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-4890.patch The graphs still can be seen under the view when I disable the

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of Spring-DM being the RI of this spec). The code was

Request for being in the contributor list

2009-09-24 Thread Siqi Du
Hi, I am a java dev from Shanghai. I would like to apply for being in the contributor list of Geronimo so that I can assign a issue to myself and be assigned a job. My JIRA id is siqi.du and my full name is Siqi Du. Thanks. -Siqi

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 14:58, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 818468

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818468 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/unit-test

Re: OSGI progress

2009-09-24 Thread Quintin Beukes
I learned OSGi while implementing Felix. Was a good place to start. The Felix docs wasn't that good in introducing OSGi (at the time at least) and consisted mostly of example tutorials on implementing the basic OSGi models, though a little bit of logical thought with them got me into starting an

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Donald Woods
Agree with the move as long as it stays its own separately consumable subproject. -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version

Re: Request for being in the contributor list

2009-09-24 Thread Donald Woods
Hi Siqi. Thanks for the interest in Geronimo. Since you have a CLA on file, I've added you to the geronimo-contributor groups for the JIRA issues and Confluence wiki. We look forward to your community involvement. -Donald Siqi Du wrote: Hi, I am a java dev from Shanghai. I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Jarek Gawor
I'm +1 for the move. I'm just curious. Is the plan to move the Blueprint trunk and tags? or just trunk? Jarek On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec,

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm +1 for the move. I'm just curious. Is the plan to move the Blueprint trunk and tags? or just trunk? I suspect the tags really should remain here for the benefit of anybody looking for the code for the one version that has been released from the Geronimo project.

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm +1 for the move. I'm just curious. Is the plan to move the Blueprint trunk and tags? or just trunk? I suspect the tags really should remain here for the benefit of anybody looking for the code for the one version

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

2009-09-24 Thread Lin Sun
+1 Lin On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of Spring-DM being the

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4683) Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

2009-09-24 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4683. --- Resolution: Fixed Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4683) Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

2009-09-24 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4683. - Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 818589

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818589 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 818573

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818573 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090924/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090924 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4889) sysdb-portlets BUILD ERROR

2009-09-24 Thread Akira Higuchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akira Higuchi closed GERONIMO-4889. --- Resolution: Invalid Fix Version/s: 2.2 sysdb-portlets BUILD ERROR

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 818684

2009-09-24 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 818684 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090924/unit-test

Re: [FYI]Summary list for G2.2 doc updates

2009-09-24 Thread Delos
Thanks, Jeff. Here are some comments in blue for the update 1. Manage user Account in GEP http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/configuring-your-development-environment.html#Configuringyourdevelopmentenvironment-Editingaserverconfiguration If your server installation uses a different set of

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-552) Unable to satisfy dependency from org.apache.geronimo.feature.feature.group 2.1.1

2009-09-24 Thread Delos Dai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12759389#action_12759389 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-552: download additional