[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-598) Support builds on Linux x86_64 based systems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-598. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2.0 2.1.5

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 826595

Geronimo Revision: 826595 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/unit-test

Re: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4915) SVN urls on the site is outdated/wrong

I don't know how the site release process work, but I ran mvn site for my branches/2.2 checkout and no site was generated for the maven-plugin. Maybe when the site is generated and assembled it gets copied over, and since there is no override it just leaves the other intact? I also received a lot

Re: osgi trunk

I am also interested in questions that Quintin raised. Hope the answer could at least give us a big picture about what OSGI+Geronimo will be. Jeff C On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Quintin Beukes quin...@skywalk.co.zawrote: What exactly will be the affect OSGi will have on Geronimo? Will

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4910) Problem in geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-4910: -- Assignee: Rick McGuire Problem in geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4910) Problem in geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-4910. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 826623. Problem in geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec

CXF + Geronimo + Spring= working example?

Hello, I'm finding many problems when I try to publish and consume a CXF webservice using spring and Apache Geronimo. Can anyone send me a working example? My email is: westhstudios[a]gmail.com Thanks, Westhveg -- View this message in context:

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 826647

Geronimo Revision: 826647 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091019/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091019/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4918) Incomplete, not working support for singleton EJBs even though OpenEJB 3.1.2 is used

Incomplete, not working support for singleton EJBs even though OpenEJB 3.1.2 is used Key: GERONIMO-4918 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4918

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4918) Incomplete, not working support for singleton EJBs even though OpenEJB 3.1.2 is used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Quintin Beukes updated GERONIMO-4918: - Attachment: SingletonDeploymentGBean.java singleton.patch Apply

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 826658

Geronimo Revision: 826658 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/unit-test

Re: CXF + Geronimo + Spring= working example?

You might be able to get better results on the user list. There is a bigger likeliness of someone having done what you are trying. What problems are you having? Did you enable CXF? Quintin Beukes On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Westhveg westhstud...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm finding

Re: CXF + Geronimo + Spring= working example?

Hello Quintin, Thanks for your reply. You can take a look at this post: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-when-deploy-CXF-WebService-(Service-resource-injection-failed)-to24245804s134.html#a24268388 After solve this, I detect that Spring is not injecting bean references in my published webservice.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

David, are you working on a new TranQL release in order to include the stale connection patch? -Jack On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail. Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2. -Donald Donald

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4917) Figure out how to use ext and endorsed classpaths under felix/karaf and get our corba spec in there.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767409#action_12767409 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-4917: I'm pretty sure that OSGi doesn't

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4909) How should we shut down plugin under osgi?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767420#action_12767420 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-4909: When a configuration bundle is

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4909) How should we shut down plugin under osgi?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767423#action_12767423 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-4909: I think the blueprint model maps pretty

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767425#action_12767425 ] Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-4912: There was some recent discussion within

Fwd: Central Artifact Metadata Outdated

I'm not sure if you guys are in charge of deploying the XBean project to the Maven Central repository, but I'm getting the following and they said the problem is on the deployer's side. Message follows: --- Hey, I'm getting the following,

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 826761

Geronimo Revision: 826761 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/unit-test

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4885) Configure default max heap and max permsize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4885. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Defaults are now -Xmx 256m and

Re: Central Artifact Metadata Outdated

On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote: I'm not sure if you guys are in charge of deploying the XBean project to the Maven Central repository, but I'm getting the following and they said the problem is on the deployer's side. Thanks Quintin. This looks like the MAVEN 2.2 bug which

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4919) The @WebListener annotation needs to be able to accept a value as the description

The @WebListener annotation needs to be able to accept a value as the description - Key: GERONIMO-4919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4919 Project:

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 826735

Geronimo Revision: 826735 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091019/build-1400.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091019 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4919) The @WebListener annotation needs to be able to accept a value as the description

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-4919: -- Assignee: David Jencks The @WebListener annotation needs to be able to accept a

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4919) The @WebListener annotation needs to be able to accept a value as the description

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4919. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in rev 826817, thanks! The @WebListener annotation needs to be

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 826921

Geronimo Revision: 826921 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091019/unit-test

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767659#action_12767659 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4912: --- Seems karaf support exploded bundles

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4909) How should we shut down plugin under osgi?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767664#action_12767664 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4909: --- {quote}Normally, stopping the

Re: osgi trunk

I am trying build the trunk, but got the following error when building j2ee-security. [ERROR] Deployment failed due to org.apache.geronimo.gbean.InvalidConfigurationException: Could not load class org.apache.geronimo.security.SecurityServiceImpl

Re: Apache Karaf info

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, Apache Karaf was mentioned a couple times on this list as something we want to consider for using in/for Geronimo 3.0. So, I've been looking at it for last few days to get a better understanding how it works, what it

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-597) Wrong geronimo version detect message if create more thant one server instance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12767708#action_12767708 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-597: This problem was caused