Re: RFC 66 and Geronimo

I'm just curious about the RFC 66 implementation in Geronimo. Is there any resources we can learn just like the new framework in trunk? Thanks! 2009/10/8 Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com Ok, I was under the impression that you need to modify the bundle before the bundle is started/starting, thus

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 830852

Geronimo Revision: 830852 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/unit-test

Geronimo 3.0 build problem caused by a Karaf change?

Guillaume, It looks like the Geronimo build has been messed up by a recent Karaf change. Do you have any suggestions on what needs updating this time? Rick [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4938) Move geronimo-schema-j2ee and geronimo-schema-jee_5

Move geronimo-schema-j2ee and geronimo-schema-jee_5 --- Key: GERONIMO-4938 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4938 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security

Re: Geronimo 3.0 build problem caused by a Karaf change?

Those artifacts are available in the following private maven repo: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/org/eclipse/osgi/3.5.1.v20090827/ which is referenced in the karaf parent pom, so it should be available from maven, but given you use the car maven plugin, that may be the

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 830921

Geronimo Revision: 830921 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 830905

Geronimo Revision: 830905 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029 [INFO] BUILD

Strange problem with xbean classes

I've spent most of the morning trying to chase down a problem that showed up trying to build the system-database plugin. The problem started with this error on building that plugin: atabase\target\work\plan.xml [INFO] Started deployer: org.apache.geronimo.framework/geronimo-gbean-deployer/3

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4678) Initial Japanese translation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMO-4678: Attachment: geronimo-v22_i18n-ja_G4759.patch David, I attached the additonal tranlation patch

Re: Strange problem with xbean classes

This is driving me nuts. The only differences in the MANIFEST.MF file between the two bundles is the single extra package on the import. I can't see any reason for why the ConnectorModuleBuilder would fail to load if that import is there. Without that import, the xbean classes are not

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 831048

Geronimo Revision: 831048 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 831062

Geronimo Revision: 831062 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/unit-test

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4939) MultipartConfig changes needed

MultipartConfig changes needed -- Key: GERONIMO-4939 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4939 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4939) MultipartConfig changes needed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Goff updated GERONIMO-4939: -- Priority: Minor (was: Major) MultipartConfig changes needed

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4939) MultipartConfig changes needed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4939. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: David Jencks Fixed in rev 831066 (a few minutes before

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4678) Initial Japanese translation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4678. -- Resolution: Fixed translation of remove applied in rev 831086, many thanks! Initial

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4688) hardcode port in plan.xml of plugin farming.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4688: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2) 3.0 2.2.1 not fixed

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4865) Login module to enable Kerberos authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4865: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2) Wish List We can't include this in

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4940) CLONE -Tomcat Clustering with WADI - JSESSIONID with jvmRoute to support mod_jk routing (G. 2.1.5)

CLONE -Tomcat Clustering with WADI - JSESSIONID with jvmRoute to support mod_jk routing (G. 2.1.5) -- Key: GERONIMO-4940 URL:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4940) CLONE -Tomcat Clustering with WADI - JSESSIONID with jvmRoute to support mod_jk routing (G. 2.1.5)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4940: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2) CLONE -Tomcat Clustering with WADI - JSESSIONID with

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4907) GBeanInstance to Ignore Missing Setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4907. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: David Jencks I don't think we should fix this. I

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-4907) GBeanInstance to Ignore Missing Setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reopened GERONIMO-4907: David Blevins pointed out that we should first try to create the object, then get the set

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4907) GBeanInstance to Ignore Missing Setters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4907. -- Resolution: Fixed fixed in 2.2. rev 831109 trunk rev 831112 This change still does not

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4918) EJB 3.1 Singleton Support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Blevins updated GERONIMO-4918: Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) Summary: EJB 3.1 Singleton Support (was:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4918) EJB 3.1 Singleton Support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Blevins closed GERONIMO-4918. --- Resolution: Fixed EJB 3.1 Singleton Support -

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 831175

Geronimo Revision: 831175 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091029/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 831158

Geronimo Revision: 831158 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091029 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4923) Remove those classloader plugins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12771744#action_12771744 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4923: After searching the all the plugins, xbean-finder is

Re: [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4759) Remove repository entries via Console

Verified on Revision: 830905 build and the feature works fine now. Remove feature was recorded in Doc at [1]. [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/introducing-geronimo-administration-console.html#IntroducingGeronimoAdministrationConsole-Repository Jeff C On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:01 AM,

Mbeans for Blueprint

This topic might be a little bit independent from what we are doing in current osgi integration work. However, I would like to raise such discussion because I believe blueprint will act as an important role in our future framework. So, if we wanna leverage blueprint as a common way to construct