Geronimo Revision: 833993 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/unit-test
Thanks for publishing.
But I do miss some slides which explain the advantages of OSGI-ing Geronimo
and compare OSGI's features with the current GBean implementation.
Then, what advantages has an enterprise JEE user that wants to run her
JEE-based .ear or .war on Geronimo or WASCE?
I think, this
Geronimo Revision: 834041 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 834070 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/unit-test
Hi,
I am creaming here for your help.
I have been trying to build a Geronimo server from the SVN source for
1.5 weeks and no success.
Donald Woods and Forrest Xia helped me to try many ways and all are
failed. I tried many combination of the build environment:
SVN Tags/2.1.4
SVN Trunk
Maven
I can build branch/2.2 with JDK1.6 on Ubuntu9.04 successfully.
You may post your 2.2 build log here so that we can take a look what the
problem is.
Jeff C
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Fei LI f...@mdacorporation.com wrote:
Hi,
I am creaming here for your help.
I have been trying to
I noticed it's been too long that Geronimo Events page was not updated. I
believe users would love to know the latest event/news about Geronimo.
..
Jeff C
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Juergen Weber webe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for publishing.
But I do miss some slides which
Hi Chi Run-up and other developers,
I got another build failure for building the server from SVEN branch
2.2.
My environment are:
C:\g22man -version
Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400)
Java version: 1.6.0_16
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_16\jre
Default locale:
Geronimo Revision: 834175 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/unit-test-reports
Try deleting everything under -
C:\m2repo\com\envoisolutions\sxc\sxc-runtime\0.7.2\
and running the build again. Until your first build completes, you may
have to keep retrying until all of the build dependencies have been
downloaded
-Donald
Fei LI wrote:
Hi Chi Run-up and
I just ran into this issue building the server with a clean maven
repository. Could the issue be with the dependency available in the online
repository?
~Jason Warner
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Try deleting everything under -
Geronimo Revision: 834206 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/unit-test
Hi Donald,
I tried delete all files under
C:\m2repo\com\envoisolutions\sxc\sxc-runtime\0.7.2\
And run the command
mvn clean install -DfailIfNoTests=false -Dtest=
Then the files are downloded again and failed again.
What do you mean by:
Try deleting everything under -
Hi,
Another failed day to build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2.
My OS is Windows XP.
Today I tried:
Jsdk 1.6.0_16
Jsdk 1.5.0_22
Maven 2.2.1
Maven 2.0.10
Donald woods helped me to try shorter folder like c:\g22; c:\m2repo, did
not work.
He also asked me to delete some troubled files and
Hello,
It looks like the automated build has been failing since 11/7 on that
artifact (com.envoisolutions.sxc).
So - I think that it has somehow become corrupted in the maven
repositories. If anyone had a local version that was 'good', then they
would be able to build 2.2.
If they were
Here is what they problem is - they moved that artifact.
In its place is the following html file (rather than a pom)
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title301 Moved Permanently/title
/headbody
h1Moved Permanently/h1
pThe document has moved a
Geronimo Revision: 834286 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20091109/unit-test-reports
Hi All
Could you please tell me what is the significance of property name=local
in org.apache.geronimo.farm.config.BasicNodeInfo.
When I give local= true in clustering environment and try to deploy one
application, I am getting error like Configuration already exists. I have
also checked
Geronimo Revision: 834299 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20091109/unit-test
Hi Fei,
Looks like sxc-runtime-0.7.2.jar downloaded from central repo is corrupted
somehow. I tried mvn clean install with buildsupport by removing the legacy
sxc-rumtim-0.72 in my local .m2, and then encountered the same problem as
you described.
The size of the correct sxc-runtim-0.7.2.jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan updated GERONIMO-4815:
---
Affects Version/s: 3.0
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Update myfaces' version to 2.0
Hi,
I update to the latest G 3.0 code, and try to build through its OSGi-ready
modules. However, I encounter a problem when building
geronimo-j2ee-schema. The debug info indicates like this:
unresolved constraint in bundle
org.apache.geronimo.modules.geronimo-j2ee-schema [63]: package;
Actually the export setting has already updated in svn, but the latest jar
files are not published to the snapshot site, so now, I think that you could
manually update the files in the local repo.
2009/11/10 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
Hi,
I update to the latest G 3.0 code, and try to
Thank you Ivan for your quick response. After manually update that bundle,
another package can not be resolved for this project.
It's org.w3.xml.x1998.namespace.impl, which bundle includes it?
Forrest
Geronimo Revision: 834363 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091110/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20091110/unit-test-reports
Hi dear all,
The BlueprintMBean design has finished. I'd like to put the api codes in
sandbox and request review comments, but seems I can not create a folder for
myself in the sandbox? How to get that?
Thanks in advance!
-Rex
2009/10/31 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com
2009/10/30 Guillaume
If there is no objection, I'd like to file a JIRA to record the usability
improvements/enhancement for 3.0.
About the technical approach, Pluto or Felix web console, IMHO it's about
how to achieve these improvements, therefore we can discuss it in another
thread. :-)
Jeff C
On Fri, Nov 6,
I'm seeing a lot of warnings like this:
[WARNING] Warning building bundle org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-
naming-builder:bundle:3.0-SNAPSHOT : Split package
schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans/javaname/org/apache/xmlbeans/impl/xb/
xsdschema/Attribute
Use directive
28 matches
Mail list logo
