/server/binaries/2.1/20100407/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100407/unit-test-reports
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file
there:
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I think it would be nicer to have less but more
comprehensive samples. For example, to me 1, 3, 7, 8, and 9 could
probably be combined
JavaEE6 sample - Servlet 3.0 - Programmatically register and initialize
servlets and filters
Key: GERONIMO-5238
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5238
And we could deliver some documents for 3.0 Milestone such as:
1. how to build and run the 3.0 M1;
2. how to deploy Aries Blog sample(Jarek already wrote the instructions)
on 3.0 M1;
3. how OGSi was integrated with Geronimo;
4. (if more, please append the list)
Meanwhile, we could
Restructure samples layout to categorize samples into Java EE 5, Java EE 6, and
OSGi
Key: GERONIMO-5239
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5239
Add daytrader(JavaEE) into the samples code tree
Key: GERONIMO-5240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5240
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level:
Doc: the usage of Kerberoes realm in Geronimo
-
Key: GERONIMO-5241
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5241
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public
On 4/6/2010 5:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I came up with one solution (committed in revision 931319).
In this solution I created a maven-property-plugin which executes in
the validate phase and sets bootClassPath system property. The
value of bootClassPath property is set to
On 4/6/2010 10:34 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Should we do like the server releases?
The first new major release uses 2 digits and any follow-on maintenance
releases introduce the third digit, like -
2.1, then 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3,
For now, I'd like to focus on the central question I
Geronimo Revision: 931528 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/unit-test
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/6/2010 5:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I came up with one solution (committed in revision 931319).
In this solution I created a maven-property-plugin which executes in
the validate phase and sets bootClassPath system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854488#action_12854488
]
John commented on GERONIMO-1816:
Oh, about beans. There are XMLBeans. So what is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854507#action_12854507
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-1816:
Currently, after the server is compiled, if we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854508#action_12854508
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4909:
Not sure whether we have conclusion for this, I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-5188.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This was entirely covered by the work in the 1.2 version of the stax jar.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5178.
Resolution: Fixed
All spec implementations now use a comment service to resolve the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854540#action_12854540
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-5058:
No objections for the modifications in
Make spec version naming conventions consistent.
-
Key: GERONIMO-5242
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5242
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-4990.
--
This work appears to be complete now.
Add serialVersionUID to serializable spec classes from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854545#action_12854545
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-5242:
The version numbering conventions used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854553#action_12854553
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5113:
---
Committed in revision 931583 and 931584
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5031.
Resolution: Fixed
I believe this is complete.
Implement EL spec 2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854567#action_12854567
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-5105:
Delos, are you still planning on
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/6/2010 5:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I came up with one solution (committed in revision 931319).
In this solution I created a maven-property-plugin which executes in
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/6/2010 5:23 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I came up with one solution (committed in revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854614#action_12854614
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5231:
---
In revision 931626 I added a boolean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5105.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 931627.
New 1.4 version of the spec jar created.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854189#action_12854189
]
Jarek Gawor edited comment on GERONIMO-5231 at 4/7/10 5:39 PM:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
I considered that too. If you're dealing with released artifacts that
should work ok. But if you are dealing with snapshot dependencies, you
might have multiple jars in the same directory with a different
snapshot version.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-5019.
--
Resolution: Fixed
geronimo-cdi-1.0 spec needs to be using the JEE6 dependencies, not the
+1
I checked signature/checksums, source files, build, testsuite, and simple tests
with a server. All looked good to me. Assuming we pass the TCK, we should be
good to go...
--kevan
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Dear All,
I have managed to use maven-release-plugin to make a
Geronimo Revision: 931644 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854668#action_12854668
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5113:
---
Committed in revision 931658 support for
In my efforts to see how much ejb stuff works in trunk I've found that we need
at least a little bit of corba to get anywhere, at least the HandleDelegate, so
I'm going to be trying to enable the corba stuff as little as possible to be
able to proceed with ejbs.
thanks
david jencks
Geronimo Revision: 931743 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100407/unit-test
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:39 PM, David Jencks wrote:
In my efforts to see how much ejb stuff works in trunk I've found that we
need at least a little bit of corba to get anywhere, at least the
HandleDelegate, so I'm going to be trying to enable the corba stuff as little
as possible to be able
/activemq-console does not require admin authentication
---
Key: GERONIMO-5243
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
TCK is ongoing, the results will come out in two days.
To David Blevins :
Do we have a chance to have a 3.0.3 for OpenEJB :-)
2010/4/8 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
+1
I checked signature/checksums, source files, build, testsuite, and simple
tests with a server. All looked good to
Tim,
A subset. Geronimo will definitely support specifications such as
Blueprint, JTA, JMX, JNDI, JPA, Web Applications. Geronimo will also
provide some common services such as Log, Configuration Admin, Event
Admin, Tracker and possibly Metatype, XML Parser, and User Admin. I
don't think at this
hi,
Just find jline is removed in the past, I checked the maven repository
and find servicemix has created a jline bundle, if no special reason , I
would like to recover jline use.
Comments ?
--
Ivan
Upgrade to AMQ 5.1.3
Key: GERONIMO-5244
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5244
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
Just find jline is removed in the past, I checked the maven repository
and find servicemix has created a jline bundle, if no special reason , I
would like to recover jline use.
Comments ?
For what purpose? jline bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854820#action_12854820
]
Jack Cai commented on GERONIMO-5243:
I cannot reproduce this problem with the 2.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854824#action_12854824
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5243:
By default, activemq-console is not installed, you
Thanks Jarek, seems that Karaf has already embeds it in
org.apache.felix.karaf.shell.console, will recover geronimo-deploy-tool to
use it again.
2010/4/8 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
Just find jline is removed in the past,
45 matches
Mail list logo
