Using TCCL is really a pretty dreadful non-modular hack. I'd prefer to avoid
supplying temptation to use it to all gbeans and only supply it where it's
really essential.
If you decide to put it in anyway, I think there's another commented out line
1117 to consider.
thanks
david jencks
On
in special cases wadi clustering thread fails to load web application classes
-
Key: GERONIMO-5256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5256
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Godik updated GERONIMO-5256:
--
Attachment: geronimo-wadi-cl-bug.logs.tar.gz
geronimo-wadi-cl-bug-war.tar.gz
Felix 2.0.4 100% does not work on macs, see FELIX-2195.
What exactly is the problem with felix 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT? I haven't found any
problems.
thanks
david jencks
I have gone head with it, currently it works well. Only two more changes are
added, override two setDocBase/getBasePath methods to avoid
NullPointerException. IMO, those parameters should be of no use in the
bundle environment. Anyway, I added the TODO tags in the codes, and will
check them later.
Thanks, chi runhua for your valuable inputs.
I have already referred that part and I have succeeded in my other part of
implementation.
Wat i 'm really looking is WS-Notification mechanism sample or tutorial
using JMS - Topic Mechanism.
I found tutorial using Queue, but I'm amateur to this field
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been
updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and
Damn, I forgot about the Mac problem. I definitely ran into another
big problem with latest Felix 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT when running the tck. I
sent an email about it to the tck list. I haven't reported it yet to
Felix project as I was unable to replicate it outside the tck
environment.
Does 2.0.5 work
A little confused here
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
2.0_spec-1.0.1
2.0_spec-1.2
But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the
Convert persistence.xml version to 2.0 when embedded in geronimo plans
--
Key: GERONIMO-5257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5257
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857959#action_12857959
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5257:
It looks like Jarek did this in rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-4680:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Create a plugin in for OpenJPA 2.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12858056#action_12858056
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4680:
Trunk seems to have a openjpa2 plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12858062#action_12858062
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4680:
rev 935103 does a little osgi-fication
14 matches
Mail list logo
