Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.5 RC1

2010-04-23 Thread Delos
GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result 0: no +1: Donald, Kevan,Ivan -1: no The release process will proceed. Thank you! 2010/4/23 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com +1 Did some testing on this RC1 with eclipse 3.5.2 java ee build, everything looks fine, thanks Delos! Forrest --

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5005) uddi osgi integration

2010-04-23 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12860155#action_12860155 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5005: rev 937169 uses latest released juddi.

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

2010-04-23 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the M1 release. Here are the items I'm aware of: Ok, the following things need to be done: 1) Get the specs released (up for vote now) 2) Release the various Geronimo

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.5 RC1

2010-04-23 Thread Delos
Besides, we also get +1 from Ashish and Forrest, thanks! 2010/4/23 Delos dait...@gmail.com GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result 0: no +1: Donald, Kevan,Ivan -1: no The release process will proceed. Thank you! 2010/4/23 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com +1 Did some testing

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937168

2010-04-23 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 937168 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

2010-04-23 Thread Joe Bohn
On 4/22/10 9:17 PM, chi runhua wrote: Any documents that we plan to announce together with M1 release, for example, how to build the Tomcat assembly, how to deploy Aries Blog sample application, a brief introduction of how Geronimo is integrated with OSGi Framework or any other topics? if so, we

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying access denied security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5259: -- Assignee: Donald Woods Annoying access denied security exceptions for oenwebbeans

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying access denied security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5259. Fix Version/s: 3.0 Resolution: Fixed Committed as r937297. Published updated

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying access denied security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5259: --- Affects Version/s: 3.0 (was: 2.2) Patch Info: [Patch

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

2010-04-23 Thread Joe Bohn
One more SNAPSHOT that may be missing from the #2 list below: geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec - what are the plans for this? We're using a snapshot in trunk but I don't see it included in the current set of specs up for vote. Joe On 4/22/10 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Ok, I've put

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

2010-04-23 Thread Rick McGuire
On 4/23/2010 10:35 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: One more SNAPSHOT that may be missing from the #2 list below: geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec - what are the plans for this? We're using a snapshot in trunk but I don't see it included in the current set of specs up for vote. The concurrent stuff is a bit

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937280

2010-04-23 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 937280 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5268) Context did not start for an unknown reason -- does not help identify the true cause of a deployment failure

2010-04-23 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Context did not start for an unknown reason -- does not help identify the true cause of a deployment failure Key: GERONIMO-5268 URL:

File permissions of /www/geronimo.apache.org/

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
Jason, I assume you're the owner of some script that is extracting and copying geronimo/site/trunk/docs/ from svn over to /www/geronimo.apache.org/ every hour+5 mins? If so, can you fix it, so the files have g+w set? Other choice, would be to have infra setup svnpubsub for those files in svn

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-23 Thread Rick McGuire
+1 ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures, but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to require a

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5269) ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason

2010-04-23 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason Key: GERONIMO-5269 URL:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5269) ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason

2010-04-23 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5269. -- Resolution: Duplicate oops. ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5113) Add naming builder support for processing DataSourceDefinition annotations.

2010-04-23 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12860324#action_12860324 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5113: --- Added a testsuite test case for

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
+1 Looks good. -Donald On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. Staging repo:

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release

2010-04-23 Thread Rick McGuire
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars. This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the Geronimo

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5253) Expose java:app/AppName and java:module/ModuleName in JNDI

2010-04-23 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12860358#action_12860358 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5253: --- Added tests to testsuite for injecting

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
Believe these are okay after second look. +1 -Donald On 4/22/10 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Here are 3 scripts attached to help checkout, rat:check and build the tags in the vote. Can we ignore the following rat:check failures? geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -

[VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.1.3-2.1.5 servers

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or 2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase. You can install the plugins by

[VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.2-2.2.1 servers

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase. You can install the plugins by using the

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)

2010-04-23 Thread Joe Bohn
+1 Looks good to me. I built the specs, checked rat, etc... included them (and the aries artifacts up for vote) in a Geronimo 3.0 server image and was able to deploy and run the Aries Blog AriesTrader samples. Joe On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937472

2010-04-23 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 937472 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5270) Enforce Java1.6 for Geronimo 3.0 build in maven and perhaps enforce the required maven version as well (2.2.1?).

2010-04-23 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
Enforce Java1.6 for Geronimo 3.0 build in maven and perhaps enforce the required maven version as well (2.2.1?). - Key: GERONIMO-5270 URL:

Re: osgi finder method to xbean?

2010-04-23 Thread Lin Sun
That sounds a great idea to me! Lin On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder, could be quite useful to

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937572

2010-04-23 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 937572 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/unit-test