[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615) Implement deploy, redeploy, and un-deploy of OSGi spec-compliant artifacts to Geronimo server:

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615: --- Assignee: Tim McConnell Implement deploy, redeploy, and un-deploy

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939568

Geronimo Revision: 939568 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939642

Geronimo Revision: 939642 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports

error starting trunk server image

I recently did an svn update and build of trunk (yesterday) and I'm now getting an error attempting to start a trunk server. My svn version is 939402 Could not start bundle: org.apache.geronimo.modules.geronimo-activemq-blueprint [238] org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved

Re: error starting trunk server image

If I'm understanding this correctly it seems that activemq wants annotation version 1.0.0 (or greater) but not 1.1.0. Our geronimo-annotation spec is for spec version 1.0 but the bundle version 1.1.0. So I think we may have some version confusion. Joe On 4/30/10 8:59 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:

Re: error starting trunk server image

The activemq-core jar file in the apache snapshot site seems not the latest one, you might need to build it mannually. And the vote for activemq 5.3.2 is ongoing ... 2010/4/30 Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net I recently did an svn update and build of trunk (yesterday) and I'm now getting an

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5217) History.back and History.forward is not working correctly after change the console navigation to ajax.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-5217: - Assignee: Shawn Jiang History.back and History.forward is not working correctly

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5218) The portlets page in iframe height is limited in debug view, so that some content is not visible when expanding the tree in debug view.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-5218: - Assignee: Shawn Jiang The portlets page in iframe height is limited in debug view,

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5218) The portlets page in iframe height is limited in debug view, so that some content is not visible when expanding the tree in debug view.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5218. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 22 @rev939665 trunk @rev939666 The portlets page in iframe

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5217) History.back and History.forward is not working correctly after change the console navigation to ajax.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5217. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 2...@rev939670 tr...@rev939671 History.back and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4950) Improve usability of Geronimo Console

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12862677#action_12862677 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4950: --- #1 is completed, the infrastructure for

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5217) History.back and History.forward is not working correctly after change the console navigation to ajax.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5217: -- Fix Version/s: 2.2.1 2.2.2 Affects Version/s: 2.2.1

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5217) History.back and History.forward is not working correctly after change the console navigation to ajax.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5217: -- Fix Version/s: 3.0 Affects Version/s: 3.0 History.back and History.forward is not

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5218) The portlets page in iframe height is limited in debug view, so that some content is not visible when expanding the tree in debug view.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-5218: -- Fix Version/s: 2.2.1 2.2.2 3.0 Affects

Re: error starting trunk server image

I can avoid this error if I build Geronimo with the ActiveMQ 5.3.2 image that is currently being voted on. So, as Ivan mentioned, it appears that the latest SNAPSHOT available is not up to date and we move past this error once we move to the released ActiveMQ version. Joe On 4/30/10 9:07

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939653

Geronimo Revision: 939653 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.1.3-2.1.5 servers

I think some of the SNAPSHOT references in the artifact-aliases are not necessary but that isn't a big deal. The jpa-tests still bother me but I guess they are not really part of vote since we're not building or releasing them even though the they are included in the tag referenced as part

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.2-2.2.1 servers

+1 Joe On 4/29/10 2:07 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: I guess I don't have an issue with the presence of the SNAPSHOT aliases (at least not enough to stop the vote). I still have to finish verification of the content but since you have enough votes you can go ahead without me. Joe On 4/29/10 11:52

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release (second attempt)

+1 Joe On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars. This is a single vote for all of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars (second attempt)

+1 Joe On 4/27/10 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE 6 schemas. These are used by different

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release (second attempt)

+1 2010/4/30 Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net +1 Joe On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

+1 Donald On 4/28/10 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote: Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.0 Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

-1 (sorry) There are some files with invalid license headers: /util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/classfile/EnclosingMethod.java /util/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bcel/classfile/LocalVariableTypeTable.java Joe On 4/28/10 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote: Please vote for Geronimo

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601) Module config Id not found for undeployment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12862751#action_12862751 ] Anup Dixit commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601: - Hi all, I have

Re: Confluence autoexport broken

Thanks, Joe. Looks like the site is synchronized successfully now. And I spot-checked several pages on Geronimo website randomly and noticed that {indent} macro is not working any more in Confluence 3.2. So I fixed the pages with the problem by removing the macro. Anything else, I'll update

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2

Vote passes with 10 +1 and no other votes. Rob Davies Dejan Bosanac Gary Tully Timothy BIsh Hiram Chirino Jim Gomes Bruce Snyder David Jencks Colin MacNaughton Guillaume Nodet (on the geronimo dev list :-)) I'll promote the staging repo. I haven't found any recent maven sites, and there is so

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars (second attempt)

The vote to release the Java EE schema xmlbean wrappers passes with 5 +1 votes and no -1 or 0 votes. Voting +1 were Rick McGuire Jarek Gawor Donald Woods Hai Hong Xu (Ivan) Joe Bohn The release artifacts will be promoted to central this afternoon. Rick On 4/27/2010 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

Oh ... one more little thing I forgot to mention is that the link to the staging repo in the vote is incorrect as it resolves to -027 instead of -030 Joe On 4/30/10 1:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: -1 (sorry) There are some files with invalid license headers:

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939748

Geronimo Revision: 939748 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5280) geronimo-jaspi jaspic provider won't work well under osgi

geronimo-jaspi jaspic provider won't work well under osgi - Key: GERONIMO-5280 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5280 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

Since those are Tomcat source files, does that really mean we have to fix their source before we can re-release it? -Donald On 4/30/10 1:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: -1 (sorry) There are some files with invalid license headers:

Re: Call for Participation: Technical Talks -- ApacheCon North America 2010

FYI. Forwarding the ApacheCon CFP from annou...@apachecon.com --kevan On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote: ApacheCon North America 2010 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta Technical Tracks: Call For Participation All submissions must be received by Friday, 28 May

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

IIUC then I think we do need to fix this for the following reasons: 1) We are releasing these artifacts - even if they are copies of Tomcat artifacts. The artifact is being released under the groupID org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat and it is being released in source (not just binary) form.

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939783

Geronimo Revision: 939783 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

Mark Thomas changed the license in rev 934219 on april 14 2010. That change and rev 934220 seem to indicate that the tomcat community thinks including EPL source in apache svn and releases is fine. The tomcat copies are modified from the bcel originals including: - changing the package name

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939875

Geronimo Revision: 939875 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100430/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

Thanks for checking it, usually, I hate those license related issues ;-) Just find that Kevan has post a message in Tomcat community, so depending on the result there, we could decide whether we would continue or cancel this vote. 2010/5/1 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com Mark Thomas changed

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939889

Geronimo Revision: 939889 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100430 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Customized Tomcat

After investigating the files in question there is no doubt in my mind that we have to cancel the vote. If someone from BCEL can demonstrate that they should be in apache svn, with an apache license, then we could proceed. We could also look into replacing the tomcat code with xbean-finder.