[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 1044215

Geronimo Revision: 1044215 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101210/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20101210 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044239

Geronimo Revision: 1044239 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1044331

Geronimo Revision: 1044331 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/unit-test-reports

ASF Mentoring Program

Hello my name is Anastasis Andronidis, I am an undergraduate Computer Science student in the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and it would be of my utmost interest to participate in the ASF Mentoring Program. I would be delighted to offer the best of my efforts to the Geronimo

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

Hi, OK, great! I added another comment to MYFACES-2945 explaining why I did it this way. Please tell me your final opinion after reading this comment and I'll commit an appropriate version of the proposed patch! Regards, Jakob 2010/12/9 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com: Hi I think it is not

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

Hi Jakob I think it is better do not include it as parameter and instead add some comment on the javadoc, saying the information to take into account is retrieved from FacesConfigurationProvider. The fact of use FacesConfigurationProvider is more an implementation detail than a requeriment, so if

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

Hi Leo, OK great. That's fine with me. I will apply the appropriate changes and commit the patch! Regards, Jakob 2010/12/10 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com: Hi Jakob I think it is better do not include it as parameter and instead add some comment on the javadoc, saying the information to

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044365

Geronimo Revision: 1044365 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210 [INFO] BUILD

Re: ordering tck failures in geronimo

Hi guys, As discussed, I just committed a modified version of the proposed patch. Furthermore I added the custom SPI impl that I used for testing to the issue [1] which may help for the real Geronimo impl. It would be great if you guys could check if this solution works for you, and if so, we

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1044472

Geronimo Revision: 1044472 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044497

Geronimo Revision: 1044497 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1044555

Geronimo Revision: 1044555 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20101210/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 1044560

Geronimo Revision: 1044560 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20101210 [INFO] BUILD