Re: svn commit: r1153013 - /geronimo/server/trunk/framework/modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/configuration/LocalAttributeManager.java

I agree, this is a bad idea since the felix properties class is well known and well tested. The usual way to use this class is to use the maven-bundle-plugin to include it in your jar. I really don't recommend maintaining a copy in geronimo unless we really need modifications. Any changes

Re: svn commit: r1153013 - /geronimo/server/trunk/framework/modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/configuration/LocalAttributeManager.java

Yes, just tested with unicode value in the property file, and processProperty() can not deal it correctly as java.util.Property does. I'm going to rewrite with felix properties. On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:00 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I agree, this is a bad idea since the

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744) More flexible no-redeployment option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13076081#comment-13076081 ] Yi Xiao commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744: -- Hi Jarek, how to set the

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6101) Server can't be shutdown via admin console

Server can't be shutdown via admin console -- Key: GERONIMO-6101 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6101 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744) More flexible no-redeployment option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13076103#comment-13076103 ] Yi Xiao commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-744: -- I try to add the

javax.faces.ManagedBean annotation scan problem

Hi, Dev When running javaee6-testsuite\el2.2-test , if jsf java classes is packaged in WEB-INF/lib, annotationClassSetMap(MyFacesModuleBuilderExtension.java) managebean set is empty as below, and no managed bean is loaded annotationClassSetMap.put(javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean.class, new

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1153094

Geronimo Revision: 1153094 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110802/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110802/unit-test-reports

Re: javax.faces.ManagedBean annotation scan problem

Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5817. ? If not, I will take a look at it later. 2011/8/2 viola lu viola...@gmail.com Hi, Dev When running javaee6-testsuite\el2.2-test , if jsf java classes is packaged in

Re: javax.faces.ManagedBean annotation scan problem

Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5817. ? If not, I will take a look at it later. 2011/8/2 viola lu viola...@gmail.com Hi, Dev When running javaee6-testsuite\el2.2-test , if jsf java classes is packaged in

Re: javax.faces.ManagedBean annotation scan problem

I will check it. On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5817. ? If not, I will take a look at it later. 2011/8/2 viola lu viola...@gmail.com Hi, Dev When

Re: [DISCUSSION] New look and feel of Geronimo 3.0 admin console?

2011/8/1 Russell E Glaue rgl...@cait.org On 08/01/2011 05:33 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: Thanks, Rex ! I love the new design, It's neat !My two cents: 1, Maybe we should remove the hard code 3.0 in the banner to save the effort to update in in future releases ? Maybe just 3

[jira] [Updated] (YOKO-434) When reading a value object from a GIOP stream, yoko does not determine if a source value object class had a writeObject method, it uses the target value object class.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated YOKO-434: -- Attachment: YOKO-434-test2.diff Rev 1153313 has a better way to figure out if the source object was

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1153302

Geronimo Revision: 1153302 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110802/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110802/unit-test-reports

Re: javax.faces.ManagedBean annotation scan problem

Thanks Ivan, I already checked spec, and tried your suggestion, It worked well. On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:25 PM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote: I will check it. On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, could you double check whether it is a similar issue with

RMI Object Load Balance

Hi,Dev: In current geronimo 2.1.* and 2.2.*, as i know, high scalability and load balance are implemented in web-tier and ejb-tier. I am not sure whether we support failover and load balance RMI Object and if an end-user deploy its RMI service on geronimo clustered environment so they can

Re: RMI Object Load Balance

As far as what I know about YOKO, the corba and RMI provider for Geronimo, we don't support RMI object load balance(maybe I am wrong) Forrest On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, viola lu viola...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,Dev: In current geronimo 2.1.* and 2.2.*, as i know, high scalability and load