[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6127) schema export unsuccessful error happened for spring sample travel

2011-09-28 Thread Han Hong Fang (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116202#comment-13116202 ] Han Hong Fang commented on GERONIMO-6127: -

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-4668) Parse XML error after deploying a EJB security jar

2011-09-28 Thread Shawn Jiang (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116226#comment-13116226 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4668: --- Upgraded to jaxb 2.1.13 in 21 and 22

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-4861) Deployment Plan XML Parsing - Not add generated namespace names to closing tags

2011-09-28 Thread Shawn Jiang (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116225#comment-13116225 ] Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4861: --- Upgraded jaxb to 2.1.13 in 21 and 22

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-4668) Parse XML error after deploying a EJB security jar

2011-09-28 Thread Rex Wang (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4668. Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: 2.1.8 Parse XML error after deploying a EJB

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6176) upgrade jaxb to 2.1.13 and use geronimo jaxb 2.1 spec

2011-09-28 Thread Rex Wang (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-6176. Resolution: Fixed upgrade jaxb to 2.1.13 and use geronimo jaxb 2.1 spec

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-4861) Deployment Plan XML Parsing - Not add generated namespace names to closing tags

2011-09-28 Thread Rex Wang (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-4861. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.8 Shawn upgraded jaxb to 2.1.13, so this issue

Re: [tranql-dev] Re: Pls help reivew and apply patch from https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TQL-28

2011-09-28 Thread viola lu
I tested sqlserver 2008 xa snapshot , no problem, pls release this one. On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:07 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi Viola, I think it would be acceptable to require building tranql on jdk 1.6 if the result still works with jdk 1.5. I haven't spent enough

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 1176650

2011-09-28 Thread Jarek Gawor
Geronimo Revision: 1176650 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110928/build-2000.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20110928 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [Discussion] Running Multiple Geronimo Instances

2011-09-28 Thread Russell E Glaue
Another issue found with SnapshotConfigXMLBuilder explicitly using GERONIMO_HOME ({org.apache.geronimo.home.dir}) and not the {basedir} named server instance directory. This time I made everything other than the named server instance directory read-only (i.e. only GERONIMO_HOME/GERONIMO_SERVER is

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6179) Better logging when updating a bundle in OSGi applicationa

2011-09-28 Thread Jarek Gawor (Created) (JIRA)
Better logging when updating a bundle in OSGi applicationa -- Key: GERONIMO-6179 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6179 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6179) Better logging when updating a bundle in OSGi applicationa

2011-09-28 Thread Jarek Gawor (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-6179. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Improved logging messages in revision

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6174) Environment variables being set in bin/geronimo does not account for named server instances

2011-09-28 Thread Russell E Glaue (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116601#comment-13116601 ] Russell E Glaue commented on GERONIMO-6174: --- The temp directory issue is

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6174) Environment variables being set in bin/geronimo does not account for named server instances

2011-09-28 Thread Russell E Glaue (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13116745#comment-13116745 ] Russell E Glaue commented on GERONIMO-6174: --- regarding

Re: Geronimo directory structure permissions

2011-09-28 Thread Russell E Glaue
Jarek, I appreciate this discussion was started. I am working through multiple-instance support for Geronimo, and it seems the code is not consistent in using org.apache.geronimo.home.dir (geronimoHome) vs org.apache.geronio.server.dir (geronimoBase). The correct use of the two is hinted at in

Re: Geronimo 3.0-beta Release Status

2011-09-28 Thread Forrest Xia
Rex, Seems we want to wait a little bit longer(for openejb 4.0.0 release) to branch the current trunk out to 3.0-beta in branches, that properly happens around first half of October, right? Frank, I think 3.0-beta will be the apache one aligned with CE 3.0. Forrest On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:22

Re: Geronimo 3.0-beta Release Status

2011-09-28 Thread Rex Wang
2011/9/29 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com Rex, Seems we want to wait a little bit longer(for openejb 4.0.0 release) to branch the current trunk out to 3.0-beta in branches, that properly happens around first half of October, right? Yes, The only dependency - OpenEJB 4.0.0 has not started

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6180) Persistence ref info should not processed by EJBBuilder

2011-09-28 Thread Ivan (Created) (JIRA)
Persistence ref info should not processed by EJBBuilder --- Key: GERONIMO-6180 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6180 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6180) Persistence ref info should not processed by EJBBuilder

2011-09-28 Thread Ivan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13117016#comment-13117016 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-6180: Commit changes to trunk at r1177170. It looks to me

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (GERONIMO-6180) Persistence ref info should not processed by EJBBuilder

2011-09-28 Thread Ivan (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13117016#comment-13117016 ] Ivan edited comment on GERONIMO-6180 at 9/29/11 5:50 AM: -