I think it really depends on how much memory you have, many of the
specjbb/specjappserver results are run on 32bit machines with 4GB ram
setting -Xmx2048m -Xms2048m is fine. As Matt points out there is more
than one out of memory condition. From memory I think 1.4.2 server had
a max permsize
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Ever since we shipped 1.0, I have been getting a surprising number of
private emails from old fiends, old Geronimo contributers, companies,
and just random people telling me that the are excited about Geronimo
and want to join in. They all inevitably ask me for
Sachin Patel wrote:
It would be cool to have automated performance tests for components
that get kicked off with continuum. We could graphically chart the
results to be able to track perf improvements or regressions. If
there are any regressions it would then be easy to determine what
I had a quick look at retrotranslator today. Generics and some other
language 5.0 features were, as some of you may know, originally
developed on a 1.4 JVM. So in principal this is a cool idea and at one
point the javac engineer suggested we provide the target 1.4 option. I
would probably draw
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-770?page=comments#action_12359871
]
Calvin Austin commented on GERONIMO-770:
There is an artificial way to reproduce this I discovered by accident. Simply
start org/apache/geronimo/DeployerSystem
There was a discussion earlier on the alias on what Geronimo could or
couldn't do with the JDK and other Sun libraries. You can actually do
more than most people think, but anyway for a developer using Java
already making them download another JDK is overkill.
regards
calvin
Barry van
Rick McGuire wrote:
Andy Piper wrote:
At 04:26 PM 10/26/2005, Rick McGuire wrote:
The most critical need right now is to have a replacement to the Sun
ORB that would allow portability to other JVM impelementations. The
lack of a full-function compliant ORB is the main factor locking
btw Technically there is such a thing as a Sun JRE +javac/tools.jar that
isn't a JDK. It was done to enable JSP development
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docchanges.html
regards
calvin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, the JDK is required in M4 according to a previous email from
Dain where
I saw that too, our nightly build worked thursday am PST and when I
tried last night it failed. I ended up doing cvs checkout as below and
use maven build offline for that component to get back to a usable system.
Those classes are generated via idl so they match their IDL form, ie
upper case
One thing you can try is to compare your build output to a successful
build, it may have generated an error/warning earlier
There are also several build tests that fail if geronimo or another
application is using the default geronimo/tomcat ports. I've discovered
that for myself in my current app deployment plan testing. at least on
linux you can do fuser -n tcp portid to find out who is using what.,
fuser -n tcp
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jun 13, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Calvin Austin wrote:
We have both of those samples in our test tree. I can certainly
double check petstore and add adventure builder (we have 1.0.1 )
Can you make your deployment plans for these publicly
We have both of those samples in our test tree. I can certainly double
check petstore and add adventure builder (we have 1.0.1 )
regards
calvin
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Actually this is a great opportunity for someone to get involved with
Geronimo.
Does anyone want to work on updating the
I cross-referenced our nightly build and it looked fine
http://www.spikesource.com/spikewatch.logs/fedora-3-i386/663/geronimo/logs/geronimo.build.maven.log
That build system was using jdk1.4.2_08 on fedora 3. The castor file
should have been correctly downloaded
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
