I should be sending a revised copy later today. I still need
to know the contact person for this PR; this is the name,
title and phone number of who should be contacted should
anyone reading the PR have any questions.
Since we submit the PR in MS Word format, that is how I will
be sending it to
We will review this and provide any feedback to you. Once approved
by both you guys and the PRC, we will submit it for the wire.
It is not an instantaneous process taking 24-48 hours, and
so doing that in conjunction with when you want the PR
released is some scheduling fun :) For example, you
Quick look:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
OpenJPA projects. Here is a list of some of these programming
enhancements:
Here is a list... sounds clunky... we will reword that.
... continued promotion of the ”Little G” 2.0.1 —a lightweight
Also sounds clunky:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
We will review this and provide any feedback to you. Once approved
by both you guys and the PRC, we will submit it for the wire.
It is not an instantaneous process taking 24-48 hours, and
so
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Even if we submitted the PR for release today, the earliest it would
go out would be Thurs. There in an inherent latency in the release
process in the wire service.
Thursday would be fine
IMO, as written this lacks the pizzazz to be a PR... Tart
it up a bit :)
On Aug 7, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please include your updates and comments on this press release.
After Thursday I'll forward to the PRC for their review with our
comments. I'm cross-posting here to
PROTECTED]
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/14/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IBM and Covalent grants for the J2G Migration toolset
(as described here and in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
GERONIMO-2743)
have been rec'd and filed.
The IBM and Covalent grants for the J2G Migration toolset
(as described here and in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
GERONIMO-2743)
have been rec'd and filed.
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Filip,
OK. Now I'm confused.
Do you want Geronimo to accept a code donation? Or do you want to
start a new project in incubator? I thought it was the former (and
I'm pretty sure you do, too).
The process IIUC is roughly
1. Geronimo
Acknowledged that both ServiceMix and Synapse will
provide info...
ServiceMix will ensure that it is clear that they are still
in incubation; Synapse has graduated so no such restriction
is required. Paul: please forward this to the Synapse/WS PMC.
Wouldn't it be best to, if Dojo is going to be a
separate module to actually see if they would
consider it being an ASF project? Other ASF
projects other than Geronimo would have great
use for it.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Christopher M. Cardona wrote:
Gianny,
Thanks again for finding time
Are plugins specific to Geronimo and Geronimo alone?
If so, then a sub-project might be a nice idea.
If not, however, then there is little compelling need
to make G even more bloated with efforts than it is,
and making it a self-contained project would be best.
Will there be a summary of the IRC discussion posted onlist?
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
After agonizing over this on IRC let's put in 2313. Close the door
and start testing.
David Jencks wrote:
GERONIMO-2313 is a fairly serious security problem: basically ejb
Not a vote in any way, but experience has shown (in
various other projects) that those last minute
additions almost invariably cause problems :)
On May 23, 2006, at 1:43 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I don't agree. 1.1 is not yet out the door, and if anything, it looks
like 1.2 will take longer
On May 23, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Ken, et al,
I'm not sure about other people's feelings regarding exceptions to
the Review then commit but I'd like to request some special
consideration for DevTools and DayTrader. Both of these dev trees
are external to mainline
on and request an exception to
Review and Commit for Devtools and DayTrader.
Matt
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 2:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 5/22/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to concerns about how some changes have been getting
made in the codebase, I am
On May 22, 2006, at 2:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 5/22/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to concerns about how some changes have been getting
made in the codebase, I am changing the commit model
for the time being.
Effective immediately, the development model for
On May 22, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Erin Mulder wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that it is possible to run a properly configured
instance of
Geronimo using J2SE 5.0.
That being said, the target audience of a Quick Start Guide/
Getting Started
document is interested in getting an
On May 18, 2006, at 11:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers,
I'm updating the Quick Start guide for Geronimo 1.1
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/
Geronimo+v1.1+-+Quick+start+-+Apache+Geronimo+for+the+impatient).
Does Geronimo 1.1 out of the box
On OS X, the java stuff are all symlinks. eg:
java@ - /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
CurrentJDK/Commands/java
So the trick is to adjust the main CurrentJDK symlink in
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel5 Apr 20
On Apr 19, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Hmmm.. What level of Tomcat does the community want to include in
G1.1?
Background...
Tomcat 5.5.9 - current working level in G1.0 and G1.1.. Clustering
works.. TCK is testing with this level..
Tomcat 5.5.10-5.5.14 - clustering is
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
http://www.covalent.net/about/news/pressreleases.html?pressid=83
Let's put a link to that in the 'news' section on the
project front page.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer,
this update in the JIRA as soon as I get it from you.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
http://www.covalent.net/about/news/pressreleases.html?pressid=83
Let's put a link to that in the 'news' section on the
project front page
On Jan 27, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
I really like Dains idea. How about we update the TODO list or
RoadMap with some of these ideas.
Usually new people who are interested in contributing will take a
peek there, so a current list of things to do is great from
attracting
Within the ASF, the use of the development mailing list is *the* method
of development discussion. That's the reason for it.
Wikis are good for after the fact documentation.
IRC is good when a small subset of developers need to
get together quickly to talk about some aspects of
development, but it
I never considered this issue as anything serious at all.
Quite the opposite; as I mentioned just about every ASF project
has had this pop up. I was simply stating the general rule, without
any sort of interpretation of the events that lead to
it. :)
26 matches
Mail list logo
