Yes you are crazy.
I have to agree - dependency hell is not something I'd like to have to
overcome. Eclipse's deal is a nice example.
Kit
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd
Im using the pax-logging stuff on a project. Very nice.
Kit
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, the pax project has lots of interesting things.
See http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+RadMan and
much more.
On 10/3/07, Guillaume Nodet
--
perl -e 'print
unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
+2 ; }
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge
Me too. I think.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
Here here.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
Sure Guillaume.
Maybe the best thing to do is explain the concept...and what we've
done to
meet our requirements.
It is actually quite simple. We needed to be able to connect two
computers
together via TCP/IP, and have a publisher on one system
your
experience
on ServiceMix. So I'm starting this new thread. Would you mind
throwing a few
ideas there ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 23, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Kit Plummer wrote:
On 8/22/07, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting.
We need to have a very serious chat
I'd be up for a few chat sessions!
On 8/23/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, if there is sufficient interest, we could organize irc meetings
to discuss these topics and post the log to the dev list for archiving
and later discussion.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 22,
for
sequence diagrams. I'm not sure if they have a free version or not.
Doesn't OmniGraffle do some UML stuff too?
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
On 8/22/07, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting.
We need to have a very serious chat about application lifecycles and
governance...
Terry
And Federating...distribution of the NMR across n-platforms!
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http
ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
As long as I can comment out the feature at one place I don't mind the
styleguide stuff. But, you are right...seems like it would be more of a
pre-commit hook thing.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge
On 7/25/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/07, Kit Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as I can comment out the feature at one place I don't mind the
styleguide stuff. But, you are right...seems like it would be more of a
pre-commit hook thing.
Well the problem
On 7/6/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on splitting the container and
components release cycles. What do people think about that ?
Should we keep the container and all the components in a single
from the container ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
Sounds good. If you already have something set up...that's fine with me.
Kit
Brian O'Neill wrote:
All,
OK. So I officially started a new service engine. Guillaume, I
figured I would use servicemix-bean as a template. Does that make
sense to you?
Jean-Sebastien, thanks for the pointers.
kitplummer (im)Agreed...and I believe based on my limited knowledge of
Tuscany that updating the TuscanyRuntime to be able to deploy a SCA POJO
should be straight forward - and simpler with the EmbeddedSCADomain.
I also agree on the tooling to provide the mapping between an SCA
Composite to
Kit Plummer
Advanced Programs
Raytheon Missile Systems
520.360.4729 (cell)
520.545.9346 (desk)
kitplummer (im)Thanks again Jean-Sebastian.
At this point I think Guillaume is correct - we need to look at the SE.
I'm _guessing_ that the current TucsanyRuntime class gets simplified,
or replaced
:
tuscany_version20060317/tuscany_version
Jean-Sebastien, can you recommend a stable branch to move to?
Guillaume, any suggestions?
-brian
Kit Plummer wrote:
Hey guys.
Here's the direct link to the use case that Brian referenced:
http://www.jbizint.org/wiki/index.php?title
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kit Plummer updated SM-976:
---
Attachment: checkstyle_fixes_servicemix-sca.diff
This diff covers all of the CheckStyle and PMD errors
Components: servicemix-sca
Reporter: Kit Plummer
The current state of the servicemix-sca codebase requires turning off the
CheckStyle plugin in SMX/parent/pom.xml and installing it into the Maven repo.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37900
]
Kit Plummer commented on SM-761:
Not sure if it is really related to this particular thread of discussion, but I
can
Versions: incubation
Environment: Running Ubuntu Breezy. Java1.5.06
Reporter: Kit Plummer
Priority: Blocker
Maven test fails because:
---
Test set: org.test.AppTest
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-445?page=all ]
Kit Plummer closed SM-445:
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Problem, was an older ActiveIO. My bad.
FactoryFinder in ActiveIO has moved. Breaks FlowProvider.java
23 matches
Mail list logo
