Hi
Sounds useful! I wonder if we want to support injecting both or just
bundleContext, since it is pretty straightforward to get bundle from
bundleContext (or the other way around).
Lin
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking about adding
Congrats Shawn!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to welcome Shawn as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
invitation to join the PMC. We look forward to working with him to maintain
oversight of the Geronimo project.
Welcome!
--
Ivan
Congrats!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Delos as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on GEP and Samples, Delos also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
Congrats!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12903529#action_12903529
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-5553:
---
Hi
After some initial investigate, it turned out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4681.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I believe this work is done in current trunk/plugingroups/javaee6-web-jetty
:
On 8/20/2010 4:36 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it. At
least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the
openejb-client.
Also, I don't quite understand this comment in G roomt pom.xml -
!-- Use
org.apache.geronimo.javamail
Yes they are all in the current web profile assembly with no plan to
remove them.
Thanks,
Lin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
We need connector, TranQL and RAs for OpenJPA
-Donald
On 8/20/10 2:29 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Ok, regarding tranql RAs
Hi
I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the
requirements for Java EE 6 web profile and prune the unnecessary
artifacts. I've been mainly look at the tomcat7-javaee6-web and I
have some comments/questions:
felix core: i assume we'll always ship 2 osgi runtime?
connector
tranql could comment
on this?
Anything else I missed on this topic?
Thanks
Lin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met
on this topic?
Thanks
Lin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the
requirements for Java EE 6 web profile and prune the unnecessary
It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it. At
least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the
openejb-client.
Also, I don't quite understand this comment in G roomt pom.xml -
!-- Use org.apache.geronimo.javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail
Hi
Does anyone know the latest test status of these standalone TCKs?
I am building my G 3.0 server and intend to run these TCKs one by one,
except the at-inject-tck and the jcdi-tck. The at-inject tck doesn't
need a full G server and it all pass now. From what I heard, the
jcdi-tck isn't
Hi
I tried to run the following:
jaxb-tck-runner, stax-tck-runner
it both has run.sh scripts and requires JAXB_HOME or STAX_HOME to be set.
Anyone knows where these variables should be set to? Thanks
Lin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Does anyone
I agree too!
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described
here --
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK
The
Hi
I have been investigating how to run the JSR 330 tck (also called the
atinject tck), as this is a requirement for Java EE 6 compliance.
I am able to check out the open web bean project and run its atinject
tck from the open web bean project checkout dir, using the atinject
tck runner provided
Hi Donald
Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point
me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid
archive to be deployed to a App server?
Please see more comments in line.
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
is the open web bean jar(s).
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Donald
Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point
me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid
archive to be deployed to a App server?
Please
.
-Donald
On 8/11/10 9:30 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi
I have been investigating how to run the JSR 330 tck (also called the
atinject tck), as this is a requirement for Java EE 6 compliance.
I am able to check out the open web bean project and run its atinject
tck from the open web bean project checkout
+1 sounds reasonable
Lin
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
Jarek Gawor brought to my attention that the web services support in 3.0 has
not yet gotten any testing or attention. While it builds, it is in a state
where it doesn't really work. Since the
Seems No. 3 is the right approach, given that there is no overhead on
the user side and it gives the ability to add the imports at the last
minute, before the PU is resolved.
No. 2 gives some extra work on the user side which can make the PU not portable.
Np. 4 has to be done when PU is
Hi
I think no. 3 is cool. some other qualifiers that I can think of are
3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release
Lin
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Before the milestone release we might have to figure out what osgi
version (if any) the Geronimo
, May 6, 2010 at 15:24, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I think no. 3 is cool. some other qualifiers that I can think of are
3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release
Lin
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Before the milestone release we might have
Congrats Donald!
Lin
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new member
of the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition of his many
contributions to Geronimo, OpenJPA, and
That sounds a great idea to me!
Lin
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently
in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder,
could be quite useful to
Great news. Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I recently integrated the JTA and JPA pieces from Aries in Geronimo
and exposed connection factories in OSGi service registry. With these
changes we now have all the main pieces in place
I think there was a similar discussion on aries list last year, and we
decided to use the ones from osgi (which is more current and
official).
Lin
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I noticed some comments on a felix list that I think indicated they
Hi, thanks for trying that. I guess the difference of your scenario
vs. what I've tried before is that your scenario imports the package
but also exports the package(like bundle 2)
Lin
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Lin Sun
+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
a few link function okay.
Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira
list, it contains hundreds of items!
Lin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:56 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've managed
Hi,
Do we have to use Require-Bundle here? I would think Import-Package
of packageX with the mandatory attribute should wire bundle 2 to
bundle 1.
Here's my understanding of your scenario:
Bundle1:
Export-Package:x;partial=true;mandatory:=partial
Bundle2:
Import-Package:x;partial=true
Interesting. I used other mandatory attribute without Require-Bundle
fine before. And partial here is just same as other mandatory
attribute, right?
Anyway this should be something quick to try to see if we could avoid
Require-Bundle
Lin
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rick McGuire
Hi,
I wonder if ear should continue working as what what they were working
before and would not be installed as bundles in OSGi framework. And
if users want to leverage OSGi functions in ear, they would have to
migrate their ear file to an Aries Application
Hi Jarek
Great progress! I have 2 minor comments, let me know if I misread it -
1. You may want to unget the ApplicationMetadata manager service
2. the deploymentException message looks weird - Unable to copy app
client module jar into configuration
Thanks
Lin
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:59
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785488#action_12785488
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4971:
---
FYI
Hi, see comments below.
Lin
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
The URL handler is a different stage of the processing. That gets involved
at the installation time of the bundle, and
causes a transform of a standard WAR into a WAB, which then gets
What I meant was that geronimo has full control of artifact deployment
when user is deploying through the geronimo supported deployment
mechanism. You are right that a bundle can use
BundleContext.install() to install any bundle at any time, but that
doesn't mean it will work or it is supported.
Ok, I was under the impression that you need to modify the bundle
before the bundle is started/starting, thus I was suggesting the url
handler to do so.
Lin
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not trying to implement a new way for Geronimo to convert a
Hi, Please see comments below, Thanks
Lin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
For a WAB deployment, the extender become involved after the bundle has
been installed and started. At this stage, there's no opportunity to modify
the bundle contents.
You are
+1
Lin
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
The Aries podling has just been accepted (see
http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place
for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo.
This vote is mainly for
+1
Lin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4683.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4683.
-
Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correctly
Thanks. If there is no objection by end of Sunday, I'll start this
work earlier next week.
Lin
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed, since it won't hurt.
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I
Hi,
Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G about the Transaction.commit
signature is missing the IllegalStateException. The reason why I
raised this JIRA is because in OSGi RFC 98 (Transaction in OSGi)
compliance test, we use Geronimo's JTA spec jar as the baseline.
During OSGi RFC 98 compliance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4683.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Lin Sun
Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun reopened GERONIMO-4683:
---
I just realized that the SecurityException is also unchecked exception. So we
are listing one
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would like to welcome Shawn, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
invitation to become a committer. His account (genspring) has been created
so we may be seeing some commits from him soon.
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would like to welcome Rex, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
invitation to become a committer. We are still waiting for his account to
be created, but hope to get that straightened out shortly
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
invitation to join the PMC. We look forward to working with him to
maintain oversight of the Geronimo project.
Welcome!
david
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12724211#action_12724211
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4711:
---
Where is the component definition for this gshell
Also, would it be possible to get it working by specify a version range, like:
Import-Package:javax.transaction;version=”[1.1,1.2)”
Lin
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Lin Sunlinsun@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting prob... I wonder if you add the split-package (see
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Lin Sun
I found out the Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correct.
Per JTA 1.1 for the Transaction interface:
commit
public void commit() throws RollbackException
Interesting prob... I wonder if you add the split-package (see
http://www.aqute.biz/Code/Bnd) when you export the jta packages would
solve the prob for you. This is what I have been using but I only
tried Equinox so far.
Export-Package = \
I believe this is caused by the fact that config admin service is not
active yet when I attempted to start the bundleprint sample. After I
made sure config admin is active, this error doesn't appear.
Lin
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Lin Sunlinsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I followed the
Hi,
I followed the instruction in the blueprint README and everything went
well till step 5a - start bundle id for blueprint-sample
- start 9
Bundle start
[org.apache.geronimo.blueprint.container.BlueprintExtender] : Scanning
bundle blueprint-sample for blueprint application
One example that we did this is with the config-substitution property
file where we allow users to specify configuration and the server
reads the config-substitution property file during the startup of the
server. If we more or less freeze the configuration, wouldn't this
(reading data from
One quick way would be allow users to start a tomcat server from a
geronimo tomcat javaee5 assembly or little G tomcat assembly(say
geronimo.sh start tomcatOnly=true). It is possible to just launch
the tomcat server, and read the configuration files (conf/server.xml,
etc) and start a tomcat
I am not a tomcat expert either... :-) I think we could also try the
following approach:
1. figure out how to read tomcat server.xml like you described.
Tomcat is using
2. at the G server startup, transform data in tomcat server.xml into G
config.xml, if there is change to server.xml since last
Hi,
In case you don't know, the OSGi Alliance has chosen to use the
Geronimo txmanager to build the Reference Implementation of
Transaction in OSGi (RFC 98). If you are interested in RFC 98, there
is an early draft specification avail off the OSGi Alliance home page
(go to
that primarily uses import-package.
thanks
david jencks
Rick
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 13, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
I think I was not too clear below. I didn't mean to say that I am in
favor of Require-Bundle because it is a lot harder to come up with the
right Import
here:
http://thhal.blogspot.com/2008/02/dependencies-and-package-imports.html
- in particular in the first comment from Neil Bartlett and the
limitations of Require-Bundle documented in the OSGi v 4.1 core spec
(section 3.13.3).
Lin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com
See comments below.
Lin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
The point I was trying to make is that with Geronimo the classloader
hierarchy is pretty much created/setup at build time while in osgi if
you are using Import-Package is at runtime. Here's an
I think this is a valid concern. My understanding is that the OSGi
community is working hard on this as they are working on
specifications for a Web Container in OSGi with requirements like Java
EE compliant web container in OSGi. They are also working on
specifications for JNDI in OSGi,
I think this is a fair requirement from.I also think the OSGi
community is aware of this requirement. For example, the web
container in OSGi spec that I am following, it requires the web
container in OSGi to support deployment of traditional war file as
well as the OSGi bundle war file.
Lin
Congrats Ivan!!!
Lin
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he recently accepted the Geronimo
PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just created this
morning (xuhaihong), so you should start seeing some
Hi David, I think this is a good move and worthy investigation! I
have some comments below.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Geronimo has been around for a while and despite the many good features
gbeans and the geronimo kernel are not catching on big
not be necessary if you had
performed the step immediately prior to the copy (chmod -R g+w
public_html/staging-site/[siteId]). Are you sure you didn't just skip that
step by mistake?
Regards,
Joe
- Show quoted text -
Lin Sun wrote:
I hope I resolved this.. I also updated the component
The vote passes with 7 +1 votes (all from PMC members) and no others.
I'll push the binaries and site out today.
Thanks!
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes
issues)
Components: transaction manager
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Lin Sun
Assignee: Lin Sun
Fix For: 2.1.4, 2.2
Txmanager 2.1.2 is released. Let's update pom.xml to use it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4564.
---
Resolution: Fixed
updated trunk and 2.1.4 server to use txmanager 2.1.2 (see subversion commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4564.
-
update to use transaction manager 2.1.2
---
Key
Hi,
Many thanks to Joe and Donald for their votes! Anyone else wants to
vote but hasn't had the time to do so? Let me know... I can extend
the vote till end of Monday.
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on single host -
default impl needs some 'random' entropy
GERONIMO-4438 -
Here is my +1 too
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4506.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
resolved - see subversion commit tab
switch to use
Ok, I thought it would not be long before I can start a vote on this.
I'll revert this in case someone else wants to work on the txmanager
2.1.2 branch.
Lin
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:25 AM, lin...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4519.
---
Resolution: Invalid
mark as invalid (see subversion commit tab)
When XAException.XA_RBROLLBACK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4506.
-
switch to use txmanager 2.1.2-snapshot in geronimo server 2.1 branch
+1 Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
Lin
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think it's time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release. We've had a lot of
important fixes since 2.1.3 and we should get them out to our users.
And if we agree, I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12666594#action_12666594
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4519:
---
I have been reading the XA spec again
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: transaction manager
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Lin Sun
Assignee: Lin Sun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4519:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: 2.2
When XAException.XA_RBROLLBACK arisen from
Good point - I agree the vote only passes if it doesn't cause any tck prob.
Lin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
Would like to see a full run of the TCK to make sure there are no
regressions before we release it
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
Hi,
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4448:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
TransactionManager resume method should only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4438:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4461:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Improve exception during transaction manager one phase commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4461.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits tab
Improve exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4466:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
Improve exception during transaction manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4466.
---
Resolution: Fixed
see subversion commits tab
Improve exception during transaction manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4449:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4471.
---
Resolution: Fixed
see subversion commits tab
improve heuristic exception handling in rollback
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4478.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits.
enhance exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4478:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
enhance exception handling during transaction rollback
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4482.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits tab
a few improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4482:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
a few improvements on XAExceptions during enlist resource, prepare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4471:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
improve heuristic exception handling
Hi,
I 'd like to release txmanager 2.1.2 as I made some changes to it
recently. I am going to work on putting a vote out if there is no
objection by end of tomorrow.
If you are interested in the details of the changes, I think most of
them are recorded as JIRAs:
GERONIMO-4438
GERONIMO-4448
Kevan, Thanks for resolving this. I haven't thought of those
SNAPSHOTS were dated, as changes have been there for quite a few days.
Lin
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Donald, I performed a complete
Donald, I performed a complete build (mvn clean install) last Friday
with this change. There were only a few web services test failure but
my test server appeared to hang. So I reran these failed web services
tests individually and they all passed.
Lin
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Donald
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12662397#action_12662397
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4486:
---
Hi Janet, thanks for the feedback! Interesting
1 - 100 of 990 matches
Mail list logo
