[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2758:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
Assignee: Donald
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1293:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
Provide tomcat statistics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-807:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.0
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2814:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
2.1
Add a second repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1293:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Provide tomcat statistics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1686:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 api jars for JavaEE 5 work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2621:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Exception handling in Console
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2885:
-
Fix Version/s: Verification Required
JSF is leaking application ClassLoaders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3124:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3206:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3207:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
Verification Required
Close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3127:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
2.0
ERROR [DriverDownloader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3191:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
Verification Required
Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3123:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3198:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M6)
2.0
Revert back to xalan 2.6.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-411:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
This issue has been around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3335:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Make it easier for a local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3316:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
warn but don't prevent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3270:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Avoid CMP foreign key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3257:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
Verification Required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3310:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Geronimo is not finding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3326:
-
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2387:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Server life cycle log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3040:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Implement process to ensure
I have taken a first pass at going through the JIRAs under the 2.0-Mx
buckets and targeting them appropriately to 2.0, 2.0.x and 2.1
buckets.
I used the following criteria while putting them in the 2.0 bucket
-- critical and blocker jiras
-- some must need jiras for 2.0
-- jiras with patches.
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2771:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
Verification Required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1842:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
2.0.x
Dynamically load jars from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3322:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
web apps with login config
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2878:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
JVM stats exposed through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2700:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3279:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Pass some serializable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3278:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Pass and return Vectors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2401:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Upgrade commons-logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3254:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Admin Console Wizard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3208:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
In-place deployment fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2990:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Axis2: Supports OASIS XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2550:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Plugin enhancement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3340:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Take apache directory plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3337:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Deploy of servlet-examples
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3317:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1761:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Do you still intend to put
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3244:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Tasklist for adding new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3280:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0.x
Pass some serializable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1567:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Plan XML files aren't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-3341:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.0
Slim down geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2950:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1792:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
2.1
Ant Tasks Mirror of Maven
Yes.. I have created 1.2 branch of this schema in svn.
We should hopefully be able to release 2.3.0 of xmlbeans-maven-plugins
soon. Once that is done, I shall put the 1.2 version of j2ee-1.4
schema up for a release vote.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/24/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its about that time to liberate trunk from the lethargy of waiting
for 2.0 to ship and I propose that we branch on Monday morning around
0900 Eastern time. This will make trunk 2.1-SNAPSHOT and I'll copy
trunk to
All this exercise is only for the Java EE 5 schema artifacts, right ?
We don't plan to do it for j2ee-1.4 schema artifacts, correct ?
Because, it has already been released.
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/1.1/
Cheers
Prasad
On
-
grep -t Sun *
on WinXP to find the copyright and then opened the file with Visual SlickEdit
, which will open anything and handles embedded nulls.
On Linux, open the file with vi and just search for Sun.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
What did you use to view the xsb ? I tried viewing a few
-repository/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/
Neverthless, they all have *.xsb files in them.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 1.1-SNAPSHOT that we released earlier has the XSBs in them too.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've mentioned this a few times before...
I think we should move the STATUS file up to the top-level geronimo
dir. As in:
svn mv http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap reopened GERONIMO-1525:
--
I still see this error in 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Try to create a DB pool wizard and click
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-1525.
Resolution: Fixed
user-error. I was specifying the whole url jdbc:derby:(dbname
Please review the release candidate of version 1.1 of geronimo-schema-jee_5.
The tar ball is at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1.tar.gz
The svn location (with restricted access) is at
in it -
schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans\system\s89707DCAF3CBDF7238EB45FA6C3735CD\index.xsb
Is that OK?
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the release candidate of version 1.1 of
geronimo-schema-jee_5.
The tar ball is at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1.tar.gz
I'm +1 for releasing it just the way it is. Don't spend any more time fixing it.
However, I also understand that once it has been released, it will
have to be maintained to some extent. (Unless we can ask bug
reporters to move up to 2.0, if it addresses that problem.)
Cheers
Prasad
On
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/16/07, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I get for cutting and pasting a previous vote as my starting
point :-)
Ok, we're voting on the following:
1) Release 1.1 of the javamail 1.4 spec API. The artifact in question
is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1.
Jeff mentioned that people feel strongly about their webservices pack
much like they would about religion. Does anybody have an idea on how
these are most commonly used ?
1. Do people preferring one webservices pack also prefer one
webcontainer over another ? Eg. do axis2 folks prefer Jetty over
The voting ends with 11 ayes. I shall release the specs now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am
If you are doing an offline build on a clean repo, you will have to
build javamail separately from it's own svn tree. It is not a part of
the Geronimo tree.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/12/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I do an offline build, I am getting the following build
. This is further complicated by the project
incubating status, since it requires two levels of voting to get released.
Rick
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
please chase these projects and get them to release the artifacts,
whatever it takes
Jacek,
You are right. That is the correct SNAPSHOT version
openejbVersion3.0.0-SNAPSHOT/openejbVersion
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/11/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/11/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
openejbVersion3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/openejbVersion
Where did you
A convenient wiki page to track the progress
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/SNAPSHOT+dependencies+that+need+to+be+released+for+Geronimo+2.0
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
please chase
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/
Voting concludes on
On 7/8/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One obvious problem here is that the plugin installation is trying to use
the geronimo-transaction-jta11 module which doesn't exist any more.
Trying the link
http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-2.0/repository/indicates
the apache snapshot
Using the published openejb artifacts will give this problem. Build
openejb locally to get around this. Hopefully somebody from openejb
will publish new snaps soon.
Cross-posting to openejb dev list for their attention.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Yeah.. Maybe I didn't want to spook this vote again with a Friday the
13th deadline ;-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right?
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had
And my +1 too
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review
The following Geronimo dependencies uses SNAPSHOT versions. Can we
please chase these projects and get them to release the artifacts,
whatever it takes; contacts, muscles, bribes, favors, etc :-)
If enough people on this list volunteer to get some of these released,
then I'll create a wiki page
Kevan,
I'll work on it.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/9/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
issues so I'll spin
On 6/21/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
working that way too.
All in all its been an excellent six
David Master Yoda Jencks,
When you went through the list of artifacts in our G repo, did you see
any that looked like we may not need it but it may have been picked up
as a M2 transitive dep ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/1/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Kevan
On 6/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice. Thanks for doing this Jay and Prasad...
Nothing really jumps out at me as being unnecessary... Just scanning
that list for the big hitters...
com/sun (5M) is new
org/apache/yoko (4M) is new
org/apache/castor (3M) is new. OpenEJB is no
/geronimo is in the installed directory but not in my database.
I'll rebuild the table and see what comes out. Also, I'll 'map' the
repository/geronimo to repository/org/apache/geronimo so that the
table makes sense.
Jay
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Matt, Jay,
The repository shifted from repository
repository/org/codehaus/castor/castor
which would show us any growth between Castor 0.9.5.3 to 1.0.5.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Here is a spreadsheet of the comparison between the disk usage (du -k)
values of v1.2 and v2.0.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pZVJhnHN3LjuF5FjgmXnrRQgid=0
us to compare similar artifacts, like
repository/org/codehaus/castor/castor
which would show us any growth between Castor 0.9.5.3 to 1.0.5.
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Here is a spreadsheet of the comparison between the disk usage (du -k)
values of v1.2 and v2.0.
http
Another thing to remember is that M2 builds gave us transitive
dependencies. So it could quite be possible that we picked up some
unneeded artifacts.
We bloated by 20+M from 1.1 to 1.2.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Jay D.
Matt, Jay,
The repository shifted from repository/geronimo to repository/o.a.g
from v1.2 onwards. We'd have to compare it against that directory to
get a good picture.. I added the same comments to your wiki page.
On 6/21/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://
java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp
OpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is
working that way too.
All in all its been an excellent six
at the time stamp of the error Tue Jun 26 05:24:42 EDT
2007 and the fact that the configs are being downloaded, it might be
necessary to ensure that mvn deploy finishes before the clock strikes
12! If not the snapshots are updated from the repo...
Thanks
Anita
--- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I was wondering if we should also publish the artifacts automatically
after a successful build. Looking at the apache-snapshots repo, the
last published snapshots are more than 2 weeks old.
So is it a good idea to publish snaps also after a successful build ?
If so, what is a good frequency ?
.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I think we should start running the entire testsuite. We have
quite a bit of tests there that should tell us if some basic
functionality is broken.
Jarek
On 6/22/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if we
Congrats Lin !
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/21/07, Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Lin!
Thanks for all your hard work!
On 6/21/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Lin..
On 6/22/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Lin!!
Joe
Davanum
Yayy !! Congrats Tim !
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/21/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Tim!
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Tim McConnell has recently
accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Tim has
done some great
The last time I spoke to Matt (Fri afternoon), he was going to release
it. Since he is on a sorta vacation, we should do it ourselves.
Either someone can guide me how to release it or release it themselves
for now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/18/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone
after their date. It would be
really helpful if we could approve this spec by tomorrow
(Friday). Anyone opposed or have a comment on how to handle this?
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
ws-metadata will have a 3 digit
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/11/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503428
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-3234:
--
Completed: At revision: 546167
Please review and close
On 6/11/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section
Jacc: +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong
Deployment : +1
scm section in pom.xml is wrong.
Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun
explanatory comments in
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/10/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Binaries and source look good.
--kevan
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block.
And my +1 too.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/8/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET.
Cheers
Prasad
Matt,
If you need any help in releasing them, please let me know. Anything
you need - building them, cross checking,etc.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/7/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am putting together a list of specs that need to be released. I am
planning on taking the current
I believe Anita's multiple instances work is now closed and has gone in M6.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011
I'm editing the release notes to affect this change.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/1/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, here is the template for the release
/4/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Anita's multiple instances work is now closed and has gone in M6.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011
I'm editing the release notes to affect this change.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/1/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
with the name of the jar to which
the bean belongs to.
Eg: deployment-id=ejb.jar/SimpleStatelessSession
This eliminates the deployment of another app having a bean with the
same name packaged in a same named jar.
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/29/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too long ago
Yep. We should.
What say we branch 2.0-M6 now for both Tomcat and Jetty (end of a
month, regular milestone release) and then branch again soon after
certification for Tomcat alone with an appropriate label (say
geronimo-tomcat-jee5-2.0-beta, or geronimo-tomcat-jee5-2.0-certified )
?
Cheers
201 - 300 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
