[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 566045 Geronimo Revision: 566046 built with tests included See the full build-0400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070815/build-0400.log [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [compiler:compile]

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread David Jencks
I encountered this error earlier today but couldn't figure out what the test was trying to test or why it is failing. thanks david jencks On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 566045 Geronimo Revision: 566046 built with tests included See the full

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Jarek Gawor
I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this failure: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.0/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/Configuration.java?r1=558791r2=565908 But there might be more to this problem. Yesterday I was trying to

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Donald Woods
I did a clean build on Linux and WinXP after applying that change and the tests passed for me. -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this failure:

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Donald Woods
Also, there have been 3 build successful notices since then from Prasad's automated builds -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this failure:

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread David Jencks
I wonder if the test is indeterminate? thanks david jencks On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Donald Woods wrote: I did a clean build on Linux and WinXP after applying that change and the tests passed for me. -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Jarek Gawor
I think I remember Prasad saying that only the 5am tests run with tests on And I see the error every time I run the tests. Jarek On 8/15/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, there have been 3 build successful notices since then from Prasad's automated builds -Donald

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Donald Woods
Seems that we should always run the tests, to help catch environment/setup differences -Donald Prasad Kashyap wrote: No.. The automated build runs on Linux and it failed there. Shall I run tests throughout the day now till these tests are fixed ? Cheers Prasad On 8/15/07, Tim McConnell

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Tim McConnell
Fails for me as well. Could it just be a Windows failure ?? Jarek Gawor wrote: I think I remember Prasad saying that only the 5am tests run with tests on And I see the error every time I run the tests. Jarek On 8/15/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, there have been 3 build

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 566046

2007-08-15 Thread Prasad Kashyap
No.. The automated build runs on Linux and it failed there. Shall I run tests throughout the day now till these tests are fixed ? Cheers Prasad On 8/15/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fails for me as well. Could it just be a Windows failure ?? Jarek Gawor wrote: I think I