Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful

2007-10-07 Thread Prasad Kashyap
These test results are not accurate. The tests were hanging and stepping into the next scheduled builds. I killed it. Cheers Prasad On 7 Oct 2007 14:33:10 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geronimo Revision: 582613 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful

2007-10-04 Thread Lin Sun
On the build machine, do we always run the build after a clean .m2 repo? After seeing so many 2.0 good build notification, I still cannot build 2.0 branch. I kept getting failure here - Missing: -- 1) org.apache.xbean:xbean-naming:jar:3.2-r579367 Try downloading the file manually

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful

2007-10-04 Thread Prasad Kashyap
OK. I cheated.. slightly.. just a li'l bit :-) Yes. On the build machine, we do build with a clean repo every time. Maven, I think, automatically mirrors it's central repo to ibiblio. Ibiblio has now become slow and timesout frequently. Now I have overridden the mirror settings for the central

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful

2007-10-02 Thread Joe Bohn
Prasad, You should be able to remove the building of openejb from the 2.0 builds.We're now using the openejb 3.0-beta-1 rather than trunk. Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 581221 Geronimo Revision: 581365 built with tests included See the full build-1600.log file at

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful

2007-09-28 Thread Jarek Gawor
Does anybody have any ideas about the following error (sometimes it works fine, sometimes fails like that): [INFO] Building Geronimo TestSuite :: Web-tier Testsuite [INFO]task-segment: [install] [INFO] [INFO]

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful for Revision: 562977

2007-08-05 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
Isn't this build supposed to be building trunk? If yes, it should build 2.1-SNAPSHOTs and not 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT? I do not see any point in building 2.0.1-SNAPSHOTs. Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenEJB trunk at 562974 Geronimo Revision: 562977 built with tests skipped See

Re: [BUILD] 2.0: Successful for Revision: 562977

2007-08-05 Thread Matt Hogstrom
We probably don't need these built right now. On Aug 5, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: Isn't this build supposed to be building trunk? If yes, it should build 2.1-SNAPSHOTs and not 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT? I do not see any point in building 2.0.1-SNAPSHOTs. Thanks Anita --- [EMAIL