>
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Vamsi
> >
> > On 7/7/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I created an empty WIKI page @
> >>
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCA
page @
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany
+Geronimo+Integration.
We should try to capture the key points for the discussions.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
"Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
>
>
> > Hi Simon,
> >Comments inline.
> >
> > On 7/
Comments in-line...
On 7/6/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
> > modules that
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
> modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
> file. So I was on two
Sorry for jumping on this thread a little late, but I would like to
cover your question around data sources and connection pools you had
in item B). Comments inline...
On 6/29/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
> Vamsavardhan
On 7/4/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
file. So I was on two minds here whether to mandate
sca-contribution.xml or not.
Hi Manu,
Let's see what's
Hi Jacek,
The spec also says in 1.10.2.2.
The contribution optionally contains a document that declares runnable
composites, exported definitions and imported definitions. The
document is found at the path of META-INF/sca-contribution.xml
relative to the root of the contribution.I thi
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a subset of the distributed SCA domain composite
representing that component and enough in
uly 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
> Hi ,
>From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
> the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
> scenarios that Sebastien has explai
Hi Jacek,
Glad that you could join this discussion. Welcome :). We
need more participants like you to join this dicussion to come out
with the best approach. I have added my comments inline on my
understanding on why we should be doing this. This is actually based
on the JEE SCA inte
On 7/3/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(a) I develop SCA components, assemble them in a composite, package them
in an SCA contribution. I don't really know what a WAR or an EAR is, I'm
just using the SCA programming model and packaging model. I deploy my
SCA contributio
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
and then my understanding, approach and issues. I would be just
listing two of the scen
On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:11 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
> Some of the questions we have are:
> 1. Should we use this plugin approach and host the plugin
separatley
> or intergrate Tuscany to be bundled as part of the Geronimo
> distribution?
The plugin approach looks OK to me, but maybe somebody
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
> integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
> that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany mod
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
> integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
> that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany mo
Comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services by l
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services by looking up in JNDI. I have
put the code in Ger
19 matches
Mail list logo
