Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-27 Thread Donald Woods
If you can create a stand-alone junit testcase that recreates the problem, then you can open a issue against OpenJPA 1.2.1 in their JIRA - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA Given this level passed the Geronimo JEE5 TCK runs and the OpenJPA team's own internal testing, I would be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-27 Thread Kevan Miller
On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: snip I will try to create a test that has a similarly complicated entity relationship but uses only JPA standard links. Sounds good. If that works - how should we handle it? If the assembly passes TCK, and the problem is only related to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-27 Thread Joe Bohn
Thanks Jay for continuing to test the release and dig into this issue. My comments are inline with Donalds. I would recommend pursuing the specifics more with the OpenJPA team. For Geronimo 2.1.4 I think we need to ship this as is (assuming tck continues to pass) and possibly pull a new

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-27 Thread Jay D. McHugh
I was hoping that most people would be leaning that way. Jay Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks Jay for continuing to test the release and dig into this issue. My comments are inline with Donalds. I would recommend pursuing the specifics more with the OpenJPA team. For Geronimo 2.1.4 I think we

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-27 Thread Jay D. McHugh
I tried to create a simplified test case. But it worked like a charm - So, I must have been taking advantage of a bug that has been corrected. I will try to sort out my entity relations to figure out what I am doing wrong. Jay Donald Woods wrote: If you can create a stand-alone junit testcase

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-26 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Hey all, I know that this vote is cancelled, but I tried my real app on 2.1.4 RC1 and some JPA entities are not working the way they used to on 2.1.3. I am trying to figure out if I have been taking advantage of a bug that has since been corrected - or if a problem snuck into JPA. I will let

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-26 Thread Joe Bohn
Hi Jay, Yes, please do let us know. I'm nearly done generating a new set of images and will start the vote again shortly. However, as the previous comments indicate, the images themselves are not functionally different than what you are using ... just adding in a missing license header and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-26 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Hey again all, I think that this may caused by my rather extreme entity relationships and the use of OpenJPA's proprietary @ElementJoinColumn annotation. I have the following relationship structure: project - projectDetail (project 1-M projectDetail using @EJC) - component (projectDetail 1-1

[DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Server 2.1.4 RC1

2009-03-25 Thread Joe Bohn
Message created for any discussion of the pending Geronimo 2.1.4 RC1 currently up for vote. Thanks, Joe