OK OK I should have pointed out that I applied the patch after we got
to 3 +1's yesterday :-)
Thanks everyone for voting! Now we're up to 6! (assuming I can count
that high :-) (and not meaning 6 factorial)
Guillaume mentioned yesterday:
Btw, would it be easier for the m2 migration, to
+1
On 6/14/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Hiram Chirino wrote:
+1
On 6/13/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a pretty simple minded uncontroversial patch that's
been sitting around for 3 or 4 days now after 2 quick +1's. I know
we're trying to get
+1
On 6/13/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a pretty simple minded uncontroversial patch that's
been sitting around for 3 or 4 days now after 2 quick +1's. I know
we're trying to get 1.1 out the door but another review would be
really appreciated to keep the m2
+1
Hiram Chirino wrote:
+1
On 6/13/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a pretty simple minded uncontroversial patch that's
been sitting around for 3 or 4 days now after 2 quick +1's. I know
we're trying to get 1.1 out the door but another review would be
really
This is really a pretty simple minded uncontroversial patch that's
been sitting around for 3 or 4 days now after 2 quick +1's. I know
we're trying to get 1.1 out the door but another review would be
really appreciated to keep the m2 migration moving.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 10, 2006,
