Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3 compliant)
So what I
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis
+1
The main assemblies build and seem to work fine for me. Can you
double check that the installer assembly builds? On my machine it
looked like there was a version missing for the javamail spec for
that assembly, although I'm not sure how that is possible.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun
David Jencks wrote:
+1
The main assemblies build and seem to work fine for me. Can you
double check that the installer assembly builds? On my machine it
looked like there was a version missing for the javamail spec for that
assembly, although I'm not sure how that is possible.
Yes, there
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
Rick
+1
- ??? -
???: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
??: dev@geronimo.apache.org; server-dev@james.apache.org
: 06/06/25 14:40
??: Re: [RTC] Removal of the javamail-transport code.
Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org
On 6/22/06, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
-1
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/22/06, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the
Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
Rick
+1
BTW, do you think that
Ok, on to the next phase of the javamail reorganization. This patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2147
is to remove the javamail-transport module and replace it with
references to the javamail-providers-1.3.1 jar file.
Rick
14 matches
Mail list logo
