[RESULT][VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Hi guys, time to tally the vote, John, Mark, Me, JL and Jay voted +1, since John changed his -1 in +1 after having rechecked we don't have any other vote so it makes us enough bindings to have this vote passing. I will promote the binaries ASAP. Thank you all! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

+1 On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:15 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > +1 > > Le mar. 20 mars 2018 à 15:03, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Thanks John, and also thanks for taking a very in depth look at even the >> details! >> >> And here is my own >> >> +1 >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

+1 Le mar. 20 mars 2018 à 15:03, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Thanks John, and also thanks for taking a very in depth look at even the > details! > > And here is my own > > +1 > > as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 14:49:56 CET, John D. Ament < >

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Thanks John, and also thanks for taking a very in depth look at even the details! And here is my own +1 as well. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 20 March 2018, 14:49:56 CET, John D. Ament wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > Le 19 mars 2018 20:20, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > > The check in the build is that there's a NOTICE file available, and if its > there you should use that. > > Realistically what I

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Le 19 mars 2018 20:20, "John D. Ament" a écrit : The check in the build is that there's a NOTICE file available, and if its there you should use that. Realistically what I would have done is replaced the NOTICE.vm from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/xbean/trunk/

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

The check in the build is that there's a NOTICE file available, and if its there you should use that. Realistically what I would have done is replaced the NOTICE.vm from

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Yes, we eventually also like to fix the year "Apache XBean Copyright 2005-2013" 2013 ;) So +1 for the release LieGrue,strub On Monday, 19 March 2018, 16:02:11 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: well if that's the direction we take I'm tempted to say that: in

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

well if that's the direction we take I'm tempted to say that: in both cases we are perfectly legally fine so we should just move forward the release if that's the only issue found. Then once passed we should solve it in a dedicated thread. This means that it is not needed to mention this one

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

well, that's why we had the BSD in there! You see? And no, the current NOTICE is NOT wrong. The BSD-3clause, the ALv2 etc allow to create a derivative work which is under another license. And this is why we have "Apache XBean Copyright 2005-2013 The Apache Software Foundation" in the NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

this is the generated/standard notice file and it is valid cause it contains our xbean-asm-util module (this is not a 100% asm shade) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog |

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

-1 The NOTICE file in the JAR is now worse. It indicates that the code was developed at the ASF. IMHO, there should be no NOTICE file in the JAR. If the NOTICE file includes just Apache XBean :: ASM 6 shaded (repackaged) Copyright 2005-2018 The Apache Software Foundation That should be

[VOTE] Release XBean 4.7 (take 2)

Hi! Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.7. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1053 The source distribution can be found here: