The voting ends with 11 ayes. I shall release the specs now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 10, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications
+1
Joe
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/
Voting concludes on
+1
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right?
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
+1
Lin
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
Yeah.. Maybe I didn't want to spook this vote again with a Friday the
13th deadline ;-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right?
Jarek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had
+1
On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
+1
Vamsi
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
+1
Jacek
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
+1
On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
And my +1 too
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the
+1
-Donald
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first
time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have
fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote.
Please review the specifications located at
14 matches
Mail list logo
