On Aug 4, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 4, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has
become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are
allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under
After a little more discussion on legal-discuss and considering that
the legal-discuss discussion is about cddl licensed schemas which are
not the ones we are using and we are following the same procedure we
have used before I'm reinstating my +1 vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 4, 2007,
As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has
become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are
allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what
license so I have to withdraw my vote for
http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-
On Aug 4, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has
become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are
allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what
license so I have to withdraw my vote for
Hi Jarek, There apparently is a bug in the 2.0.2 version of the
maven-source-plugin code that is causing this behavior. The latest 2.0.3 version
of the plugin fixes this problem. That was a good find. Thanks much
Jarek Gawor wrote:
I'm +1 on all but...
I think the
HI Kevan/David, I fully understand, but I'm not sure it makes much sense to
release the other two yet since they are both dependent on the servlet spec. At
this point based on these legal issues and the fact that I would like to ensure
they are all released using the latest maven-source-plugin,
On Aug 4, 2007, at 4:07 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
HI Kevan/David, I fully understand, but I'm not sure it makes much
sense to release the other two yet since they are both dependent on
the servlet spec. At this point based on these legal issues and the
fact that I would like to ensure they
+1
david jencks
On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
+1
David
On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
I'm +1 on all but...
I think the geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1-sources.jar should be
re-generated. Looks like the source files are duplicated. They are
placed in the right package name directory and also in the root
directory (without the package name).
Jarek
On 7/30/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL
+1
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
+1
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
+1
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
I was looking at the schemas included in the servlet specs jar:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1/src/main/schema/
Why are the following not included?
javaee_5.xsd
javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
Why is j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd
+1
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
I have not ever reviewed/voted on specs and I wanted to know what should
be checked before voting.
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The
On Jul 31, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
I have not ever reviewed/voted on specs and I wanted to know what
should be checked before voting.
Hi Jay,
Good question. Here's a start of a list
1. Do the poms look correct?
2. Are the legal t's and i's crossed and dotted? License/Notice
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
+1. Looks good. One comment -- I'm not a big fan of the NOTICE file
Ok, good info to know. Thanks
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
+1. Looks good. One
+1 for your first release Tim.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/30/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar
+1
-Donald
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
+1 ... good job
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo
specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
+1
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs:
-- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0
-- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1
The corresponding tar files are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz
24 matches
Mail list logo