PS: just changing the topic for automated tools
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-12 21:39 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Ok so here the counts:
>
> +1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding
> 0: no
> -1: 2 non
Ok so here the counts:
+1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding
0: no
-1: 2 non-bindings
Considering -1 were for an alpha we'll rerelease super fast this vote
passes and I'll assume to rerun one for jms 2 api ASAP.
Thanks you all guys to have reviewed it!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomit
On 12/02/15 09:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in
the previous version.
Fair enough. I have managed a successful ActiveMQ6 build against the
alpha-1, so the issues (for us at least) are non blocking. I'm happy to
proceed a
+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in
the previous version. Just make sure it properly gets committed in time.
If you don't have sufficient privileges to commit it yourself then just ping on
the list for a review and apply.
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesda
-1 (non-binding). There are a few issues with the JMS spec jar. There
is a PR open here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3
On 09/02/15 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hello guys,
As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
spec jars. I added javamail
I think we'll re-release jms next month anyway so not blocking (others) IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-10 17:48 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> -1 (non binding)
>
> Martyn has a few fixes that he r
-1 (non binding)
Martyn has a few fixes that he raised a PR for about JMS 2.
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3
It also looks like you already pushed the release to scm.
John
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 2:21:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> As announced few weeks ago l
+1
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
> spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
> (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
> much
+1
> Hello guys,
>
> As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
> spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
> (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
> much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small
Hello guys,
As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
(thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small
blocking bugs f
10 matches
Mail list logo