[RESULT][VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
PS: just changing the topic for automated tools Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-12 21:39 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Ok so here the counts: > > +1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding > 0: no > -1: 2 non

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Ok so here the counts: +1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding 0: no -1: 2 non-bindings Considering -1 were for an alpha we'll rerelease super fast this vote passes and I'll assume to rerun one for jms 2 api ASAP. Thanks you all guys to have reviewed it! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomit

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Martyn Taylor
On 12/02/15 09:43, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in the previous version. Fair enough. I have managed a successful ActiveMQ6 build against the alpha-1, so the issues (for us at least) are non blocking. I'm happy to proceed a

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in the previous version. Just make sure it properly gets committed in time. If you don't have sufficient privileges to commit it yourself then just ping on the list for a review and apply. LieGrue, strub On Wednesda

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-11 Thread Martyn Taylor
-1 (non-binding). There are a few issues with the JMS spec jar. There is a PR open here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 On 09/02/15 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hello guys, As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 spec jars. I added javamail

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I think we'll re-release jms next month anyway so not blocking (others) IMO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-10 17:48 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > -1 (non binding) > > Martyn has a few fixes that he r

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-10 Thread John D. Ament
-1 (non binding) Martyn has a few fixes that he raised a PR for about JMS 2. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 It also looks like you already pushed the release to scm. John On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 2:21:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello guys, > > As announced few weeks ago l

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello guys, > > As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 > spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes > (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too > much

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-10 Thread Hiram Chirino
+1 > Hello guys, > > As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 > spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes > (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too > much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small

[VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-09 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hello guys, As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small blocking bugs f