By the time we release it, it will be renamed to o.a.cxf.something.
Right now, I'm leaving the package name alone as I merge in some patches
that IONA has internally to update it to work with the latest CXF (and
latest CXF dependencies like the newer XmlSchema and such). If the
package
+1 for keeping tools.
2008/1/17, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools. It would be nice to
have our own IDL compiler. I was thinking that we could move tools to
a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up. Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
Keep 'em around, we can always whack them later.
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools. It would be nice
to have our own IDL compiler. I was thinking that we could move
tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.
I assume tools will also live in CXF for the IDL-WSDL compilers. If
we keep our own copy (which I think is a good idea) we need to make
sure that our package name is different from theirs. I assume they
will eventually use o.a.cxf.something, but currently they are not:
I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools. It would be nice to
have our own IDL compiler. I was thinking that we could move tools to
a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up. Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
