[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-12 Thread Vasily Zakharov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12374187 ] Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- Here's the stack trace that now appears in the log when trying to run the SPECjAppServ2004 atomicity tests:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-12 Thread Vasily Zakharov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12374188 ] Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- The investigations show that the cause for the stack above is the following exception. The reason for this

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-09 Thread Jacek Laskowski (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373764 ] Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- I think the patch should be accompanied with a doco on

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-09 Thread Vasily Zakharov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373765 ] Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- Good idea, I can write the doc. Should I put the doc here for someone to put it to the site you mentioned? I don't

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-09 Thread Jacek Laskowski (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373767 ] Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- You don't need to wait for anybody, but go straight to the page and write the doc. It's the only way to have

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1800) SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment Descriptors

2006-04-09 Thread Vasily Zakharov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800?page=comments#action_12373800 ] Vasily Zakharov commented on GERONIMO-1800: --- The deployment string for Derby connector turned out (thanks to David Jencks) to be wrong - XA connector should be