[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-307?page=comments#action_55369 ]
toby cabot commented on GERONIMO-307:
-
Aaron,
Thanks for looking into this. I did a new build from recent svn and the error
seems to be different. My
[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-307?page=comments#action_55371 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-307:
---
Your original geronimo plan is now wrong, see
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Naming
Most likely changing the geronimo
[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-307?page=comments#action_55373 ]
toby cabot commented on GERONIMO-307:
-
I tried installing the modules not in an ear but one at a time. EJB and RA
deployed and seem to run fine (i.e. they show up in
[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-307?page=comments#action_55374 ]
toby cabot commented on GERONIMO-307:
-
David, Aaron,
Thanks for your attention on this. The change from target-name to
resource-link is indeed the fix, and the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:01:17PM -0800, David Jencks wrote:
cmon toby, give us something to work with:-)
Looks as if our jira comments are crossing paths. After trying the
experiment that Aaron suggested I saw your comment about the changes
to geronimo-jetty and that did the trick.
Thanks,
[
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-307?page=comments#action_55127 ]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-307:
---
Toby, can you check whether this is still a problem?
Also, it may be that the modules are started out of order (web first,
