[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-724) Nested transactions do not work correctly

2005-07-07 Thread Ivan Dubrov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315277 ] Ivan Dubrov commented on GERONIMO-724: -- Yes, now it seems to work OK. > Nested transactions do not work correctly > - > >

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-724) Nested transactions do not work correctly

2005-07-07 Thread Gianny Damour (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315224 ] Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-724: This indeed seems to be an issue with the order of the insert statements. By default, SQL statements are sent to the DB in

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-724) Nested transactions do not work correctly

2005-07-06 Thread Jeremy Boynes (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315214 ] Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-724: TranQL does contain some logic to order insertions so that FK constraints like this are respected. It could be we got over-

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-724) Nested transactions do not work correctly

2005-07-06 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315213 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-724: --- I don't know to what extent tranql track and follows foreign key constraints, but it seems to me that an alternative explanat