+1
Regards,
John
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm convinced that
no one wants to issue a M5 w/o passing
It's only been a day and a half, and I guess we should leave the
window open another 1.5 days for any complaints or further support,
but if none are heard, then we unanimously want to call this our
certified release.
+1 : geir, jeremy, alan, bruce (as long as it's Jetty Tomcat),
jacek,
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm convinced that
no one wants to issue a M5 w/o passing the testsuite, so in a sense,
the question is
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm convinced that
no one wants to issue a M5 w/o passing the testsuite, so in
On 9/12/2005 4:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
M4 passed the automated tests, and M5 will. And with M5, we seem to
have no problems with the untestable assertions.
Shall we declare this our J2EE 1.4 certified release?
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 9/12/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm convinced that
no one wants to issue a M5 w/o
I was wondering about the message we're sending to the user community by
certifying a milestone release. (I think its the right thing to do by
the way). I believe there is some pent up expectation that
certification means go for production but my opinion is that certifying
a milestone is
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Shall we declare this our J2EE 1.4 certified release?
+1
geir
Jacek
On Sep 12, 2005, at 4:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm convinced that
no one wants to issue a M5 w/o
+1 from me.
On 9/12/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 2005, at 4:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a lingering
thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core issue. We
discussed worries about the
+1
-dain
On Sep 12, 2005, at 4:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to put this as a vote thread, but there was already a
lingering thread on this and we never seemed to get to the core
issue. We discussed worries about the additional effort, but I'm
convinced that no one wants to
On Sep 12, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was wondering about the message we're sending to the user
community by certifying a milestone release. (I think its the
right thing to do by the way). I believe there is some pent up
expectation that certification means go for
12 matches
Mail list logo
