Re: 2.2 progress

2009-09-23 Thread Quintin Beukes
If the update/review of the LICENSE/NOTICE information is a lot of work, send some my way if it will help release some of the developer's time for more important tasks. Quintin Beukes On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >>

Re: 2.2 progress

2009-09-23 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think things are moving along for 2.2. - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. - ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates. The first one showed no

Re: 2.2 progress

2009-09-23 Thread Donald Woods
What's the story on Jetty? The 2.2 branch is using Jetty 7.0.1-SNAPSHOT right now -Donald David Jencks wrote: I think things are moving along for 2.2. - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. -

Re: 2.2 progress

2009-09-21 Thread Jack Cai
That's great! I still hope the patch for GERONIMO-4874 can be committed. Should be a safe change. -Jack On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:26 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > I think things are moving along for 2.2. >> >> - our last internal dependency, t

Re: 2.2 progress

2009-09-21 Thread David Jencks
On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think things are moving along for 2.2. - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. Um, need to look first, kevan already voted. thanks david jencks -

2.2 progress

2009-09-21 Thread David Jencks
I think things are moving along for 2.2. - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. - ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates. The first one showed no tck problems in geronimo. - OpenEJB IIUC is pretty