Thanks Tim. I updated the wiki page to point at :
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/j2g/nightly/
Assuming that is where your J2G build script uploads the file(?)
Best wishes,
Paul
On Oct 2, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Thanks Paul, now I don't have to worry about blowing
Tim,
Sorry for the delay on this, but I just caught an issue on the site...
Under the
Daily Drivers for J2G
Unofficial daily drivers are available for download here.
The URL points to the eclipse plugins directory at
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/ rather than the j2g
Edit:
I'm a blind fool, nevermind.
=(
On 10/2/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
Sorry for the delay on this, but I just caught an issue on the site...
Under the
Daily Drivers for J2G
Unofficial daily drivers are available for download here.
The URL points to the eclipse
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G has its own
unstable site. So, I'll change the wiki to point to the j2g/unstable site
instead of the eclipse/unstable site and change my build script to FTP the
latest trunk version to the j2g/unstable site every Sunday morning.
On Oct 2, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G
has its own unstable site. So, I'll change the wiki to point to the
j2g/unstable site instead of the eclipse/unstable site and change
my build script to FTP the latest trunk
Thanks Paul, now I don't have to worry about blowing away the one on the
unstable site ;-)
Paul McMahan wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G has
its own unstable site. So, I'll change the wiki to point to the
Sounds good to me =)
On 10/2/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G has its
own
unstable site. So, I'll change the wiki to point to the j2g/unstable site
instead of the eclipse/unstable site and change my build script to
Done Erik--please let me know if you require or notice anything else
Erik B. Craig wrote:
Sounds good to me =)
On 10/2/07, *Tim McConnell* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G has
its own
unstable
Hi Jason, yes, that's a good idea--I'll add them now. Thanks
Jason Warner wrote:
Tim,
Quick thought. There are pages on the geronimo wiki that contain
installation instructions[1] and usage instructions[2]. Those links
could be placed under the appropriate headings on the Apache Geronimo
Hi Jason, this is done. If you need/want additional changes please let me know.
I really like the way you all have documented the build, installation, and usage
instructions on separate wiki pages. I'll plan to mimic that in the future for
the Eclipse plugin as well. Thanks
Jason Warner
On 9/25/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the Apache Geronimo
Development
Tools Subproject website (below) to include the latest information about
the
new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin.
---
Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the Apache Geronimo Development
Tools Subproject website (below) to include the latest information about the
new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin.
--- http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html
I've also included some information about
Tim,
Quick thought. There are pages on the geronimo wiki that contain
installation instructions[1] and usage instructions[2]. Those links could
be placed under the appropriate headings on the Apache Geronimo Development
Tools Subproject website. Thoughts?
[1]
so, how is the process to move something out of the sandbox?
I'm not too sure it's a good idea to serve the 3mb plugin from the cwiki. Actually, we
should update the J2G wiki pages to point somewhere else for downloading this tool. What
that somewhere else would be?
Cheers!
Hernan
Viet Nguyen
Hernan makes a good point, I don't think the wiki is an appropriate place to
provide access to the deployable. I wasn't aware that's what we were
actually doing, but we definitely should move it somewhere else. If anyone
has any ideas where to put it, suggestions are welcome. Also, I'd like to
As with Jason, I agree. This should probably be moved out of sandbox and
into dev tools at this point, but I am unfamiliar with the process and lack
access if it would just be a simple move that wouldn't require a vote.
Am I correct in guessing the ultimate destination for a binary release of
j2g
+1 on moving J2G out of sandbox and into devtools so we can cut a 1.0 release
to vote on
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
so, how is the process to move something out of the sandbox?
I'm not too sure it's a good idea to serve the 3mb plugin from the
cwiki. Actually, we should update the J2G
Matt,
Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I'd
rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.
-- Jason Warner
On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a SNAPSHOT
available is
Seconding Jason's take on this.
On 8/28/07, Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but
I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.
-- Jason Warner
On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let's move it to dev tools first,
+1
I do believe that the devtools subproject is indeed the best place for it
given it's purpose and functionality, that said, here are some proposed
changes to the devtools subproject page.
Add a section identical to the existing 'Eclipse Plug-in' that contains the
following:
I like it. I just glanced through it real quick but I think it might be
prudent to mention what versions of geronimo the tool is for on the
downloads page. I'm sure it's on the migration tool page already, but I
don't think it would hurt to reiterate that early on.
Thanks,
-Jason Warner
On
Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a
SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g
(usable from within the Eclipse
On 8/23/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or as an addition inside the Development Tools page,
much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
+1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
If we have some working tool that facilitates migrating to Geronimo I think
it's definitively worth mentioning on the main web site.
It seems to me that a place somewhere closer to the dev tools subproject would
be a better fit.
I see there are two documents on the wiki (for Geronimo 1.1 and
All,
After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable from
within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved logging/information
output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest out in the general
open source community in moving applications from Jboss to
With the recent activity and interest on the user/dev list with people who
are actually USING the j2g migration tool, I think we really need to make
these documents easily available asap.
I believe that the J2G link should reside under the Subprojects category
on our main page. This way the tool
27 matches
Mail list logo
