Excellent and thanks!
Alex
On 7/13/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the Directory folks are working on it. They pinged me a few
weeks ago about it and said they were going to take a swipe at it.
I would be happy to help get this updated as well.
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
Jeff G. could you see if you and Stefan Z. can do something about this to
help David?
Alex
On 7/13/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geronimo apache directory support is stuck at 0.9.2 which is antique
to be charitable. I'm not sure we want to ship something so old.
should we
- mov
David Jencks wrote:
Geronimo apache directory support is stuck at 0.9.2 which is antique to
be charitable. I'm not sure we want to ship something so old.
should we
- move it to an optional plugin and ship it when we update it?
+1, given there is a 1.0 and 1.5 branch for users to choose from
I think the Directory folks are working on it. They pinged me a few
weeks ago about it and said they were going to take a swipe at it.
I would be happy to help get this updated as well.
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
> Geronimo apache directory support is stuck at 0.9.2 which is antique to
> be chari
Geronimo apache directory support is stuck at 0.9.2 which is antique
to be charitable. I'm not sure we want to ship something so old.
should we
- move it to an optional plugin and ship it when we update it?
- update to apacheds 1.5 now?
- leave as is?
I think I'm in favor of 1 & 2 and may tak
