Hi All,
this is a question a user posted on the Knowledge Base.
Basically, where did the LDAP plugin go in Geronimo v2.0.2?
I've lost track of LDAP, does anybody has an update?
Cheers!
Hernan
Original Message
Subject: [CONF] Apache Geronimo Knowledge Base: the LDAP server
Original Message
Subject: [CONF] Apache Geronimo Knowledge Base: the LDAP server in
Geronimo 2.0.2 (page created)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Page Created : GMOxKB http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
GMOxKB
I think it is a bad idea to have some many languages in the wiki. Wiki is meant to allow one person to go in and add content or change it... by having these language specific sections of the wiki it means that one person can not really do that anymore.For example, I have absolutely no
I understand your point but if we have people that are willing to put in the time and effort at translation why should we discourage them? I think its awesome that people think enough about Geronimo to spend their time doing this for the benefit of non-english speakers. If it turns out that the
Shall we time how long the gap is when english docs are updated... and when the per-language pages are translated?I think it is great to have so many cultures interested in G, and peeps willing to translate... but I think that it is premature for our community at this time... and by trying to make
Hello Jason,I'm a little bit shocked by your message.How should Geronimo find good acceptance when it is restricted to an english speaking community only?It will be then always stay behind JBoss where the establishment of an international supporter base was very successful.
If it is difficult to
My main concern would be that I'd never know if the docs were out of
date because I would't be able to read the page.
I'd be fine with (and happy to see) translations, if:
* We take care to keep the pages for each language separate so a
reader doesn't wander back and forth
* Every page says
Would it help if we requested that each translation include a statement
(appropriately translated of course) at the top of each document that
said something like the following?
Please note that the primary documentation for Geronimo is captured and
maintained in English. Therefore, this
On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Would it help if we requested that each translation include a
statement (appropriately translated of course) at the top of each
document that said something like the following?
Please note that the primary documentation for Geronimo is
On 9/25/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it help if we requested that each translation include a statement
(appropriately translated of course) at the top of each document that
said something like the following?
Please note that the primary documentation for Geronimo is captured and
Okay, here ya go:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxKB
I did a few things...
First, I setup a geronimo team label, and labeled all of our spaces
(so from the dashboard you can see all of the G-related spaces
easily). New spaces for G should also get this label added (have
Autoexport is up:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxKB/index.html
--jason
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay, here ya go:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxKB
I did a few things...
First, I setup a geronimo team label, and labeled all of our spaces
Hi Jason,
what is the long term plan for this space? could we ultimately move/merge the MoinMoin content there
once migrated?
There is this GMOxSBOX space (the SandBox) that we could remove and put the GMOxKB instead, see
cwiki.apache.org/geronimo
Let me know what you think?
Cheers!
Hernan
I think that the bulk of what is in http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/
should move to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/
I think that the KB space is really for stuff that does not fit well
into other spaces (like docNN or geronimo), or stuff that is FAQ-like.
It looks like the moin content
Jason Dillon wrote:
I think that the bulk of what is in http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/
should move to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/
I think that the KB space is really for stuff that does not fit well
into other spaces (like docNN or geronimo), or stuff that is FAQ-like.
That was
On Jun 22, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I also think that we could probably merge GMOxPMGT into the
geronimo space, but that is just a thought.
+1
-David
IMO, the important thing is to get the content into Confluence and
out of moin. Maybe start by adding them to the sandbox
I think that the bulk of what is in http://wiki.apache.org/
geronimo/ should move to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/
I think that the KB space is really for stuff that does not fit
well into other spaces (like docNN or geronimo), or stuff that is
FAQ-like.
That was the original idea
This is awesome! I think this framework can really let us quickly
and easily grow the content.
On Jun 22, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think that the bulk of what is in http://wiki.apache.org/
geronimo/ should move to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/
I think that the KB space
Cool Jason. I like it. Can we please have to/fro links from the
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo site to the KB.
Thanx
Prasad
On 6/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Autoexport is up:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxKB/index.html
--jason
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Jason
Done.
--jason
On Jun 22, 2006, at 9:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Cool Jason. I like it. Can we please have to/fro links from the
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo site to the KB.
Thanx
Prasad
On 6/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Autoexport is up:
20 matches
Mail list logo
