My understanding was that after branching 1.2 we would focus on
stabilizing that branch for TCK. So I would not commit new features
to 1.2 and would only commit bug fixes to 1.2 after getting a green
light from one of the release managers (Dain or Alan).
Paul
On 11/20/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[
I know most of us would want to work on trunk. Whatever commits are done to
branches\1.2 should also go into trunk. Should some commits done to trunk
be considered for branches\1.2 depending on the relevance?
--vamsi
On 11/18/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Vamsi,
I'd like to
Hi Vamsi,
I'd like to try something different. Many of the JIRAs we've moved
from release to release to release. I'd like to have people look at
the JIRAs and if they are going to work on them then go ahead and
assign them to 2.0. Otherwise we'll continue to push them around
over, and
Hi Matt,
Now that branches\1.2 is created, I think we need to add 2.0 in the "Fix
version" in all the JIRAs marked for 1.2 and 1.x so that they will not
closed without merging the fix into the trunk.
--vamsi
On 11/17/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
We've been talking about
On Nov 17, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1. Upgrade all the license headers and copyright notices to
conform to the new ASF guidelines.
Just chatted with kevan and they are almost done with this. One of
the license fixes broke
On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1. Upgrade all the license headers and copyright notices to conform
to the new ASF guidelines.
Just chatted with kevan and they are almost done with this. One of
the license fixes broke something in the console and they are working
on a f
Kevan already did.
On 11/17/06, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matt, I think Jay already submitted fixes for the license headers and
copyright notices. They just need to
be committed. I think Sachin is going to do that today. Sachin ??
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> We've been tal
Hi Matt, I think Jay already submitted fixes for the license headers and copyright notices. They just need to
be committed. I think Sachin is going to do that today. Sachin ??
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
We've been talking about moving 1.2 from trunk to a branch while the
final touches are put
On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
We've been talking about moving 1.2 from trunk to a branch while
the final touches are put on it as well as promoting trunk to 2.0-
SNAPSHOT and starting the push to Java EE 5.0.
At this point it looks like most of the activity that
Matt, as I understand, the commits should go into both places (trunk and
branches\1.2) right? And dooes the goat herder need to take care of the
missing commits or just push the goat to commit in both places?
Good to see that the JIRAs for 1.2 count is coming down :o). It would have
been even b
All,
We've been talking about moving 1.2 from trunk to a branch while the
final touches are put on it as well as promoting trunk to 2.0-
SNAPSHOT and starting the push to Java EE 5.0.
At this point it looks like most of the activity that is underway in
trunk is complete. Here is the outst
11 matches
Mail list logo
