Re: Clustering docs - DB Section

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Ryan Thomas wrote: > > I just took a look at the c-jdbc design and it seems that they have to > > execute writes one at a time (one insert statement at a time) - because if > > you start multiple write transaction at the same time then multiple sites > > could execute the wri

Re: Clustering docs - DB Section

On 27 Jan 2006, at 21:16, lichtner wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, James Strachan wrote: Is anybody working on Derby clustering? http://sequoia.continuent.org/HomePage its meant to be mostly ASF licensed now; though given its L/GPL heritage of C-JDBC I'd be a little cautious of the licensing

Re: Clustering docs - DB Section

On 1/28/06, lichtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, James Strachan wrote:> > Is anybody working on Derby clustering?>> http://sequoia.continuent.org/HomePage> > its meant to be mostly ASF licensed now; though given its L/GPL> heritage of C-JDBC I'd be a little cautious of the licen

Re: Clustering docs - DB Section

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, James Strachan wrote: > > Is anybody working on Derby clustering? > > http://sequoia.continuent.org/HomePage > > its meant to be mostly ASF licensed now; though given its L/GPL > heritage of C-JDBC I'd be a little cautious of the licensing It says that is the "continuation"

Re: Clustering docs - DB Section

On 27 Jan 2006, at 19:22, lichtner wrote: I see that the DB section says "Any takers?". You want somebody to write about clustering of databases which have built-in support, or tools like C-JDBC? Is anybody working on Derby clustering? http://sequoia.continuent.org/HomePage its meant to b

Clustering docs - DB Section

I see that the DB section says "Any takers?". You want somebody to write about clustering of databases which have built-in support, or tools like C-JDBC? Is anybody working on Derby clustering?