Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
Thanks for documenting this Jeff. Hopefully this will be a temporary work-around which can later be removed once things are fixed in the repository. Which brings me to the next point - what can be done to really fix this? I guess Sun owns this repo? We could push to get the redirect

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Kevan Miller
Forwarding to dev list thread, also... --kevan On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Fei LI wrote: Hi, I am exhausted and decide to give up. If you really want to help me out, please remove your local repo completely, build from the ground and

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
I've also verified that this work-around will get Geronimo 2.2 building again. So I've now built both 2.1.4 and 2.2 from clean repos (using different jdk's, and maven versions) with the referenced addition to settings.xml. To break it down by Geronimo version: 2.2:

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Bohn
I've also been successful building branches/2.1 with Donald's most recent change to revert back to genesis 1.3.1 and the mirror for java.net in my settings.xml as mentioned earlier. here's the details for 2.1: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1 Maven 2.0.10 jdk

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for documenting this Jeff. Hopefully this will be a temporary work-around which can later be removed once things are fixed in the repository. Which brings me to the next point - what can be done to really fix this? I guess Sun owns

RE: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread Fei LI
it. From: Kevan Miller [mailto:kevan.mil...@gmail.com] Sent: Wed 11/11/2009 7:35 AM To: Geronimo Dev Subject: Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2 Forwarding to dev list thread, also... --kevan On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-11 Thread chi runhua
/11/2009 7:35 AM To: Geronimo Dev Subject: Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2 Forwarding to dev list thread, also... --kevan On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Fei LI wrote: Hi, I

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Joe Bohn
It really concerns me that we can't even build 2.1.4 from the tag. I went out there and attempted this and received the same bogus pom for several artifacts including: org/apache/yoko/yoko-rmi-spec/1.0/yoko-rmi-spec-1.0.pom and log4j/log4j/1.2.13/log4j-1.2.13.pom I was speaking with Kevan

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: Here is what they problem is - they moved that artifact. In its place is the following html file (rather than a pom) !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title301 Moved Permanently/title /headbody h1Moved Permanently/h1 pThe

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Joe Bohn
After looking into this some more and discussing it off-line with Jarek I've learned the following: - It isn't really returning a bogus pom or jar ... it is just returning a redirect. Maven wrongly assumes that this is the actual file that was requested and persists it as such. - Using Maven

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: After looking into this some more and discussing it off-line with Jarek I've learned the following: - It isn't really returning a bogus pom or jar ... it is just returning a redirect. Maven wrongly assumes that this is the actual file that

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Joe Bohn
Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: After looking into this some more and discussing it off-line with Jarek I've learned the following: - It isn't really returning a bogus pom or jar ... it is just returning a redirect. Maven wrongly assumes that this is the

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread chi runhua
I update the page on GMOxDEV based on this discussion, anything incorrect, please let me know. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo.html Jeff On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Joe

RE: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-10 Thread Fei LI
://old.nabble.com/Could-not-build-Geronimo-server-from-SVN-branch-2.2-tp26273831s134p26283602.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-09 Thread Fei LI
Hi, Another failed day to build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2. My OS is Windows XP. Today I tried: Jsdk 1.6.0_16 Jsdk 1.5.0_22 Maven 2.2.1 Maven 2.0.10 Donald woods helped me to try shorter folder like c:\g22; c:\m2repo, did not work. He also asked me to delete some troubled files and

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-09 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Hello, It looks like the automated build has been failing since 11/7 on that artifact (com.envoisolutions.sxc). So - I think that it has somehow become corrupted in the maven repositories. If anyone had a local version that was 'good', then they would be able to build 2.2. If they were

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

2009-11-09 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Here is what they problem is - they moved that artifact. In its place is the following html file (rather than a pom) !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title301 Moved Permanently/title /headbody h1Moved Permanently/h1 pThe document has moved a