I think we need to defer to 1.1 unless we have a graphic artist that can
make replacement ASL 2 licensed icons in a short amount of time.
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Great research John. Do you think we should defer the installer to
1.1 given these issues? It would certainly make a bigger
John,
Perhaps you can assemble an archive of the files that are needed and
attach this archive to a relevant Jira; this would make it more
straight-forward for someone to pick up the task without having to
know details of the installer.
Kresten
On Jan 26, 2006, at 10:06 AM, John Sisson
+1 for giving John more work :)
I think we could also post this on the things todo page.
Kresten Krab Thorup (Trifork) wrote:
John,
Perhaps you can assemble an archive of the files that are needed and
attach this archive to a relevant Jira; this would make it more
straight-forward for
Thanks for looking into this.
I've created JIRA 1544 to address the issue and believe that I have a
work-around.
Regards,
erik
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:44, John Sisson wrote:
Hi Erik,
There appears there are some issues with the licensing of some files in
the installer JAR file
Hi Erik,
There appears there are some issues with the licensing of some files in
the installer JAR file for the upcoming Geronimo 1.0.1 release.
Although the IzPack installer itself is supposed to be under an ASF 2
license, it appears that the generated Geronimo installer JAR contains
some
Great research John. Do you think we should defer the installer to 1.1 given
these issues? It would certainly make a bigger splash I think. Erik, thoughts?
Matt
John Sisson wrote:
Hi Erik,
There appears there are some issues with the licensing of some files in
the installer JAR file for
