Re: Loose end #2: sql scripts

2005-11-18 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 good idea david +1 add an opt-in flag -dain On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: My only concern is that executing SQL scripts not be the default behavior for an application. As a developer I generally prefer to be the master of the SQL and not have the server doing things

Re: Loose end #2: sql scripts

2005-11-18 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 to both ideas. For production deployments the DBAs generally don't allow servers or applications to arbitrarily create databases and tables. For development / testing this is an improvement that with an opt-in flag would be excellent. +1 to both Aaron Mulder wrote: My only concern is

Loose end #2: sql scripts

2005-11-17 Thread David Jencks
Sometimes an application needs some database tables in order to run. We don't have much support for helping with this. We have the juddi server, with a script that is run from jelly code in modules/assembly, and we have some work to generate scripts for cmp entity beans, but no automated way

Re: Loose end #2: sql scripts

2005-11-17 Thread Aaron Mulder
My only concern is that executing SQL scripts not be the default behavior for an application. As a developer I generally prefer to be the master of the SQL and not have the server doing things for me, and I think that's especially important as you look at non-developer uses. But if we have a