Hi Sainath, certainly, I'll create the GEP 2.1.2 branch this weekend and you can
start making your changes to trunk when you are ready. Thanks again for your
assistance.
Sainath Chowdary wrote:
Hi Tim, I would be returning to college by 10th of August and I will
start on this as soon as possib
Hi Tim, I would be returning to college by 10th of August and I will start
on this as soon as possible. If we need to start working from now, can you
help me with the sandbox or branching the trunk for 2.1.2?
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's ti
Maybe it's time to copy trunk over to branches/2.1 and finish any 2.1.2
work items there Why are we slowing down GEP enhancements, when we
could be using trunk for 2.2.0 and a branch for 2.1.x releases, like we
do for the server?
-Donald
Ted Kirby wrote:
Depending on the timing, Tim's
Depending on the timing, Tim's suggestion of starting now in the
sandbox was a good one. Tim, maybe you can help Sainath get started
there?
Ted
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sainath, that would be wonderful if you're going to have the time. When
>
Hi Sainath, that would be wonderful if you're going to have the time. When are
you returning to college ??
Sainath Chowdary wrote:
Thanks Ted and Tim for your feedback. I agree with both of you that we
cannot attempt this in trunk as next release is ahead of us in few weeks.
I would be happy
Thanks Ted and Tim for your feedback. I agree with both of you that we
cannot attempt this in trunk as next release is ahead of us in few weeks.
I would be happy to work on the proposed architecture for GEP once I get
back to my college. Also by that time I guess 2.1.2 would have been
released.
O
Hi Sainath, I agree with Ted as well. Your ideas seem sound but I don't think we
should attempt this in GEP trunk, which will soon be released in conjunction with
the 2.1.2 Geronimo server. As an alternative, could you possibly work on this in
the devtools sandbox ??
Sainath Chowdary wrote:
I
Technically this sounds good. The timing is another matter. G 2.1.2
will be released soon, and we'll need GEP 2.1.2 shortly thereafter,
particularly to get Ganymede support. We shouldn't "reorganize the
whole of GEP" until after GEP 2.1.2.
Ted
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Sainath Chowdary
I think that current architecture of GEP is too rigid in a way which
produces very redundant code if we extend it for future versions of
Geronimo. Also it is not compliant with multiple version of schemas.The UI
elements are also somewhat implemented in a hacky way where v20 UI depends
on v21 UI wh
