RE: Please try out the upgrade jar

- From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 12:01 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar On Jun 1, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Song Scorpio wrote: I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime, context-priority-classloader element

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

For an application which is using datasource, we should manually add dependency to deployment plan upgraded by the tool.The plan upgraded by the tool is following: - web-app xmlns =http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.0 xmlns:naming =http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1 xmlns:sec=

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

How old is the upgrade.jar you are using? Noticed that your generated plan still has the old context-priority-classloader element in it. -Donald Zhang Song wrote: For an application which is using datasource, we should manually add dependency to deployment plan upgraded by the tool.

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime, context-priority-classloader element is gone. But there's still no datasource dependency, which will cause failure of application deployment.. 2006/6/2, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How old is the upgrade.jar you are using?Noticed that

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

On Jun 1, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Song Scorpio wrote:I just tried the new upgrade.jar within server runtime, context-priority-classloader element is gone. But there's still no datasource dependency, which will cause failure of application deployment..Do you think the upgrade tool should insert comments

RE: Please try out the upgrade jar

out the upgrade jar Toby, Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in 1.1, will port to trunk soon. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2068 thanks david jencks On May 26, 2006, at 3:29 PM, toby cabot wrote: David, Thanks for providing this tool, it's a big help. I had

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

it, but it didn't make any difference. Thanks, Lin -Original Message- From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:36 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar Toby, Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in 1.1

RE: Please try out the upgrade jar

Thanks, that worked very well! -Original Message- From: Donald Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:48 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Please try out the upgrade jar E:\geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT\binjava -jar upgrade.jar Parameter usage: inputPlan

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

Toby, Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in 1.1, will port to trunk soon. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2068 thanks david jencks On May 26, 2006, at 3:29 PM, toby cabot wrote: David, Thanks for providing this tool, it's a big help. I had some problems on a

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

David, Thanks for providing this tool, it's a big help. I had some problems on a test geronimo-application.xml file that includes some gbean references (for hooking up to security gbeans). The file looks like: = ?xml version=1.0 ? application

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

On 5/12/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I think you (or someone) mentioned earlier that it might be useful to make this utility available from the admin console. Seems like one reasonable approach would be to enable the current application deployment portlet to detect when a

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

I've also noticed another difference between the 1.0 and 1.1 deployment plans. Concerning the following xml: security-realm-namegeronimo-properties-realm/security-realm-name security default-principal principal name=anonymous

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

Hi David J., This is very helpful! So far it worked for the simple ejb, war, ear that I've tested. I'll let you know if I ran into problems deploying other modules. Dave Colasurdo, FYI, I tried upgrading my geronimo-web.xml and it was converted from: web-app

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

Thanks for trying it out. I changed how it starts quite a bit today -- I hope it hasn't become too slow. I also think I fixed the schema issue Dave Colasurdo found. thanks david jencks On May 14, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Chris Cardona wrote: Hi David J., This is very helpful! So far it worked

Please try out the upgrade jar

I put the upgrade jar at http://people.apache.org/~djencks/geronimo-upgrade-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar It would be very helpful to find out to what extent this works in real life. It's supposed to include all the classes it needs (that's why its so big) usage: java -jar

Re: Please try out the upgrade jar

Thanks David! It seems to run fine on the simple plans that I have tried though I do have a few quick comments and observations.. 1) Should the version in the schema name be updated (from 1.0 - 1.1) for both jetty and tomcat plans? For example, the following line is unchanged when the tool