Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788

2006-07-14 Thread Hiram Chirino
Ok. look like there was not too much opposition to backporting this so.. I'll go ahead and do it later today. On 7/11/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 - sounds good to me On 11 Jul 2006, at 16:42, Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Folks. In 4.1 we added a patch that add support of

Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788

2006-07-14 Thread James Strachan
Great! Must be nearly time to cut a 4.0.2 release :) On 7/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. look like there was not too much opposition to backporting this so.. I'll go ahead and do it later today. On 7/11/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 - sounds good to me On

RE: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788

2006-07-14 Thread Dhawan, Vikram \(LNG-DAY\)
. Thanks! Vik -Original Message- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:26 PM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788 Great! Must be nearly time to cut a 4.0.2

Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788

2006-07-11 Thread Rob Davies
+1 - sounds good to me On 11 Jul 2006, at 16:42, Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Folks. In 4.1 we added a patch that add support of handling large string values ( 32k ) in map messages. See: http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-788 I just wanted to see if you guys think we should