Hi friends,
With new release of Geronimo-1.0, my code
is working correctly.
Rakesh Ranjan
From: Ranjan, Rakesh (Cognizant)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006
10:01 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: problem with
Geronimo-1.0
2006/1/4, Ranjan, Rakesh (Cognizant) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ObjectName gbQuery = JMXUtil.getObjectName(*:j2eeType=TransactionManager,*);
...
When I am using this with the Geronimo-1.0-M5, this is working correctly. But
with Geronimo-1.0 , this is not working correctly.
Is there a typo in the code snippet you gave us
:
TransactionManager tm = (TransactionManager)
kernel.getProxyManager().createProxy(gbeanName,
ransactionManager.class);
The missing T in the TransactionManager.class
Thanks
Anita
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Grr,
T is missing only in the mail. But this is not
the problem. Its a copying mistake.
Rakesh Ranjan
Re: problem with Geronimo-1.0
Is there a typo in the code snippet you gave us
:
TransactionManager tm = (TransactionManager)
kernel.getProxyManager().createProxy(gbeanName
Re: problem with Geronimo-1.0
Grr, more confidential information footers. Please don't do that to
public mailing lists! If your information is confidential, don't send
it to the world, and if it's not confidential, please don't assault us
with the legalese!
Anyway, now
Re: problem with Geronimo-1.0
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator)
| Show Only this Message
Rakesh,
It would help to get the information I asked for: a more complete
chunk of your code, plus all the pertinent output and a full stack
trace. Also
Grr, more confidential information footers. Please don't do that to
public mailing lists! If your information is confidential, don't send
it to the world, and if it's not confidential, please don't assault us
with the legalese!
Anyway, now that that's off my chest, Geronimo cannot (well,
