Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-06 Thread Hernan Cunico
Hi All, I updated the release notes to reflect the current certification status. Pls chime in with updates for Significant Changes in the 2.0-M6 Release Cheers! Hernan Hernan Cunico wrote: just want to reiterate the Significant Changes in the 2.0-M6 Release section is the one that needs more

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Thanks Hernan! Looks like were about there. Let's get a good thrashing on these notes so everyone take a look :-) Thanks! On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Alright, here is the template for the release notes. Need your input on the significant changes for this milestone

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Prasad Kashyap
I believe Anita's multiple instances work is now closed and has gone in M6. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011 I'm editing the release notes to affect this change. Cheers Prasad On 6/1/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, here is the template for the release

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Wait a min. All those JIRAs in the release notes are in CLOSED/FIXED state. But why are they under the Known Issues and Limitations section ? In any case, GERONIMO-3138 has been reopened. It should now be taken off the list https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3138 Cheers Prasad On

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Hernan Cunico
Good question ;-) There is a link in JIRA that creates this list of issues automatically (aka Release Notes). We should definitively show all the issues we already fixed ( a Bug fixes section maybe), and agree, Known issues and limitations should show exactly that, things we have not addressed

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Hernan Cunico
just want to reiterate the Significant Changes in the 2.0-M6 Release section is the one that needs more attention. That would basically be a diff between M5 and M6. Need your input !!! Cheers! Hernan Matt Hogstrom wrote: Thanks Hernan! Looks like were about there. Let's get a good

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Hernan Cunico
How can we review the Release Notes macro in JIRA. Do we have any control on this or it is a JIRA thing ? Cheers! Hernan Prasad Kashyap wrote: Right. I'm OK with showing the JIRAs we have fixed in this release and I am also OK with showing the outstanding issues. But in this case, the

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
yup. Thanks Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe Anita's multiple instances work is now closed and has gone in M6. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011 I'm editing the release notes to affect this change. Cheers Prasad On 6/1/07, Hernan Cunico

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-04 Thread Dain Sundstrom
IIRC it is caused by people marking a new issues as affects 2.0-M6 which is logically incorrect because an issue fixed in 2.0-M6 could not affect that release (since it is fixed). People commonly make this mistake because the believe that 2.0-M6-SNAPSHOT is the same thing as 2.0-M6 so

RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

2007-06-01 Thread Hernan Cunico
Alright, here is the template for the release notes. Need your input on the significant changes for this milestone release. Here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/release-notes-20-m6txt.html Pls chime in with the updates. Cheers! Hernan