Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Alan: I'm recreating it after having fixed the John's comments The TCK are public for bval so we obtained them from central. FYI they run in bval and tomee build. Will send the new vote shortly Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Alan Cabrera
Where is the tag for this release? I don’t see it in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/ Regards, Alan > On Oct 6, 2016, at 4:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release a 1.0 of our valida

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Alan Cabrera
Great. Where is the TCK and how was it obtained? I’d like to double check that we are allowed to use it. Regards, Alan > On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > this is a requirement for an implementation but yes bval passes it with this > and previous release. It is just

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
this is a requirement for an implementation but yes bval passes it with this and previous release. It is just about removing @Deprecated Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Alan Cabrera
IIUC, one of the licensing requirements of the spec is that it passes the TCK. Was the TCK run against this release? Regards, Alan > On Oct 6, 2016, at 4:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar. > > After having checked with gunnar

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:10 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > spec == validation-1.1 > > artifact == 1.0 ;) > Yep, that's what I was trying to write. :-) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 06.10.2016 um 14:06 schrieb John D. Ament : > > > > The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming th

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
very bad phrasing you are right: version 1.0 of geronimo-validation which targets 1.1 spec version Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog | Github

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread John D. Ament
I'd recommend making the following changes in the release: - DEPENDENCIES file is not necessary, if its easy to remove kill it. - NOTICE file is not up to date, references JSR-303 instead of 349 and copyright 2014 instead of 2016. - Specification-Version in the pom uses "1.0" but I would expect "1

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread Mark Struberg
spec == validation-1.1 artifact == 1.0 ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 06.10.2016 um 14:06 schrieb John D. Ament : > > The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in > fact the 1.1 release? > > John > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > Hi guys

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

2016-10-06 Thread John D. Ament
The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in fact the 1.1 release? John On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar. > > After having checked with gunnar the jar and removed the @Deprecated