Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

didn't do big tests but looks good to me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn |

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

/me having a look now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

If we checked we didnt put throw new UnsupportedOperationException everywhere +1, otherwise we should probably ensure it brings enough to users or catch up Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 23:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > +1, so are we ok for me to run a release on what we have? > > Le mar. 30

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

+1, so are we ok for me to run a release on what we have? Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 14:18, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 30.07.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi JL > > > > Was thinking the same,some api used by new libs like greenmail utilities >

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 30.07.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi JL > > Was thinking the same,some api used by new libs like greenmail utilities are > missing in our last bundle so we should definitively catch up. > > +1 to skip beta/milestone stage, always had been considered

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

Hi JL Was thinking the same,some api used by new libs like greenmail utilities are missing in our last bundle so we should definitively catch up. +1 to skip beta/milestone stage, always had been considered as snapshot so does not help the project much and most of the implis actually clearly not