; > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> > > On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear
set
> of
> > > > stuf
> >
ECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear set
of
> > > stuf
> > > that we want in place should be set a release date?
> > >
> > > P
> > >
> > > On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[
ave a clear set of
> > stuf
> > that we want in place should be set a release date?
> >
> > P
> >
> > On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The main point I' d like to focus on are:
* JBI TCK (which should be available to all committers that have
signed a
NDA)
* bug fixes
* documentation
+1 from me on the list.
I would add 1 extra.
* Complete working test cases. (no -Dmaven.test.skip=true)
My other thou
> On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0.
> > IMHO, we should release a 3.0 asap, and I want to propose that
> > we release 3.0 at the end of August.
> > The main point I
ant in place should be set a release date?
P
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0.
> IMHO, we should release a 3.0 asap, and I want to propose that
> we release 3.0 at the end of August.
> T
+1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear set of stuf
that we want in place should be set a release date?
P
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0.
IMHO, we should release a 3.0
